Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List eater texas a&m

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Darkwind (talk) 01:38, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List eater texas a&m[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per WP:NOTNEWS, this is a non-notable situation. A brief mention of the situation may belong on articles related to the sports team, but even that would be a stretch - an article on this incident does not belong in an encyclopedia (✉→BWilkins←✎) 20:09, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see any point mentioning this anywhere. Absolutely absurd story failing WP:EVENT and WP:GNG. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:FINDERSKEEPERS and WP:EARLYBIRD (oh, and EVENT); also the story is just absurd. Nobody was really inconvenienced besides having to wait an extra minute to get their tickets. Nate • (chatter) 01:33, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Absurd story. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 09:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If it really has become a college tradition, could be merged to Traditions of Texas A&M University but I have my doubts as to its significance. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, zero evidence of any encyclopedic notability. (Also note that the author mentions themselves in the article, making this a very thinly-veiled attempt at self-promotion.) --Kinu ^t/_c 16:27, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's an orphan for a reason. There's no significance to this event. Ducknish (talk) 20:23, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Just plain ridiculous and totally insignificant. Fails WP:EVENT by a wide mile. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 06:48, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a trivial event hardly worth coverage at the time and clearly not worth including in an encyclopedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.