Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Criterion Collection releases (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 14:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Criterion Collection releases[edit]

List of Criterion Collection releases (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Seems like the consensus has shifted since the last AfD, at least that is what this discussion suggested since no other editor of the WikiProject truly contested the claims made. Jovian Eclipse 14:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same discussion:

List of Criterion Collection boxed sets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
List of Criterion Collection LaserDiscs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Why delete and take the fun away from cinephiles? Espngeek (talk) 17:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:PLEASEDONT Dronebogus (talk) 11:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I will copy and edit what I said in the other discussion: Why are the only sources to in the article to www.criterion.com? It has no third party sources to show it even has notability. This really is just carbon copy of their website, in Wiki format. Mike Allen 17:49, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Because it's a thousand times easier to digest as a reader. If I'm looking up basic info on a Criterion release I'm not going to their website, I'm going straight to this page. Tj902 (talk) 19:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BADGERING jp×g 09:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I think List of Criterion Collection releases is the type of article that might have some encyclopedic value, but the notability of the article needs to be established in accordance with WP:LISTN. As MikeAllen points out, the lack of secondary sourcing in this article is a concern. I think the List of Criterion Collection boxed sets and List of Criterion Collection LaserDiscs are a different matter altogether; whilst I can well believe that the Criterion Collection as a whole is notable as an encyclopedic topic, I do not consider it plausible that the different format listings for the collection are notable on their own terms. So, my conclusions:
Betty Logan (talk) 11:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Betty Logan you inspired me a new reply
Filmman3000 (talk) 18:11, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Any truly notable releases (firsts, landmarks, etc.) can be (and probably are) included at The Criterion Collection without the need for this indiscriminate list of releases. --woodensuperman 08:23, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.