Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/April Fools' Day 2022 (Part 2)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< April Fools' Day 2022-1 April Fools' Day 2023-1 >

This is a continuation from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/April Fools' Day 2022 (Part 1) since the post-expand include size was exceeded on the April Fools nomination page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy vaccinate. (non-admin closure) jp×g 01:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COVID-19 Pandemic

COVID-19 Pandemic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Jesus Christ, it's been two years. Leave us alone. By: Ian1231100 [April Fools!] User talk:Ian1231100 - 02:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Bark bark bark bark bark. (non-admin closure) jp×g 01:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talking Ben


Talking Ben (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yes… no… ugh… SlySabre (talk) 22:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Kromer. –JJP ‐Talk‐☖ 21:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deltarune

AfDs for this article:
Deltarune (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part Of The Page Is About Spamton, Who Violates Wp:Spam By: Existing. Also Is This How I Make An Afd? [April Fools!] 💜  melecie  talk - 02:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proceed Nrco0e (talk · contribs) 02:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pressure Toby Fox to make Chapter 3 as the only reasonable option. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 14:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Bold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with WP:BRD (non-admin closure) Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Did everything become bold or is it me? [April Fools!] --AlphaBeta135 (talk) 02:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was The result was keep. April fools' day is over. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 08:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Work

Work (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't want to go to work tomorrow. Who's with me? Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Resign and make a living off of selling stocks and crypto-bucks or whatever those kids call them. AAAAA (AAA AA!) 03:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Get back to work. —C++coder (Merry Xmas!!! | talk | talk but in italics) 13:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was NOT kept (non-admin closure) 💜  melecie  talk - 00:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not

NOT geld!


Not (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should be deleted per WP:NOT.-KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 02:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was all hail the Minnesota Timberwolves. (non-admin closure) —GMX(ping!) 00:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles Lakers


Los Angeles Lakers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:TNT. The team is so bad they're now unlikely to even reach the play-in, let alone the play-offs. Better WP:TNT the team and the article and rebuild. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was free. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Epic Games Store


Epic Games Store (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per #FuckEpic [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was other things. (non-admin closure) —GMX(ping!) 00:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Train

This article has been written nearly entirely by User:Trainsandotherthings, who clearly has a COI with the subject. The only solution is to apply WP:TNT and start over fresh. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Purple. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 23:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blue

Blue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

Red is so much better.[April Fools!] --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 01:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eiffel 65
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was don't make it more smaller, even in the Mainspace. Please. Not all Wikipedians are near-sighted.. MOS:FONTSIZE once again. That's the reason! [April Fools!] Xingqiu • Talk 14:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure) Xingqiu • Talk 14:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small

Small (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is it just me or did everything become smaller [April Fools!] --AlphaBeta135 (talk) 01:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment wait, it became way too smaller! Xinghua (she/her) • Talk 01:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
*Shrink even farther. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 01:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Significantly the smallest font size we had ever had. Xinghua (she/her) • Talk 01:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Don't make it bigger anymore as per MOS:FONTSIZE. This joke may be too humorous just because of the name (yes, we did div-style things) to make the fonts bigger, therefore someone may not be amused due to accessibility. (non-admin closure) Xingqiu • Talk 09:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Big


Big (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is it just me or did everything become huge [April Fools!] --AlphaBeta135 (talk) 01:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The big font is causing problems on the main april fools day page, remember MOS:ACCESSIBILITY
  • Yes. Anyway, make it more bigger because, yes!~ Xinghua (she/her) • Talk 01:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Wrong venue. Should be at WP:Miscellany for deletion#April Fools' Day nominations (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 03:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Special:AllPages

Special:AllPages (edit | [[Talk:Special:AllPages|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

JUST PURGE IT ALL!!! All 6.47 million of them. OcelotCreeper2 (talk) 01:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was practically every possible !vote. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Colbert

Stephen Colbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (View AfD)

If Stephen's article gets canned, then Wikiality doesn't exist; if Wikiality doesn't exist, that means every article on Wikipedia is... fictional. --General Homer Thompsonfoolery (I think he's talking to you!) 01:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was cringe. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uncyclopedia

AfDs for this article:
Uncyclopedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The website articles are bad, cringe and I personally don't like it. Don't use Uncyclopedia, instead, use Wikipedia's sandbox.[April Fools!] – Qadri223 (talk) 01:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because I exist there and I personally like it. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as its better than Shitipedia TheScottish801 (talk) 10:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was the Gettysburg Address. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confederate States of America


Confederate States of America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In accordance with Black Lives Matter and our actions to make up for all the horrible things done to the Black population of the United States, it is important that we must delete any trace of the CSA from our encyclopedia. Keeping this article would be like keeping Confederate statues: we should not be praising the actions of a country created with the main philosophy that Black people are inferior to White people. Just as we are taking down Confederate statues, we must also delete our article to ensure that the Confederacy will never be glorified again. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And down came crashing the fifth tower of Wikipedia... MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 02:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools is over (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 01:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia


Wikipedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We've AFD'd Wikipedia so many times per COI and other reasons that I think it's a good idea that this time, we're as nice as possible. This is the nicest AFD nomination you'll ever see. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fools! April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April Fools' Day


April Fools' Day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Jimmy! What does the Wikipedia delete log say about April Fools' Day's deletion log? It's over 9000! No really, we've AFD'd the article so many times at this point that let's just preempt any remaining nominations. [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as it is not yet April 1st in my time zone. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: April Fools' Day on Wikipedia is more tiresome with each year, as the jokes get more and more densely self-referential. I've certainly never participated in it, or found it funny. It's about time we deleted it. — Bilorv (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was the best conlang jan Misali has reviewed so far. (non-admin closure) 💜  melecie  talk - 00:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Toki Pona

AfDs for this article:
Toki Pona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only the favorite conlang of the most superficial commentator on con-langues since B. Gilson, also no new radio shows, thus fails notability of con-langues [April Fools!] 💜  melecie  talk - 00:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lon pali. (Did I get that right? It's supposed to mean "yes".) 172.112.210.32 (talk) 01:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
nimi pona ala li sama nimi Inli "yes" li ala. nimi "lon" li sama nimi Inli "real"/"reality". taso ni li pona: o toki sin e nimi pali. toki ni la nimi ni li nimi "weka". ona li jo e kon Inli "make absent". -- wan Tansin[kala sona o lon] (ona/ona) 01:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The nominator is certainly not a jan pona. MJLMaster 01:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't want to learn an entire language just to come up with a quick joke so I'll simply say delete and hope that'll suffice per nom. Panini! • 🚢 01:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - If it's not relevant enough to be on Duolingo or other language learning apps, it's not notable enough for Wikipedia. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • ike. mi wile ni ala lon. sina kama ni ala lon. --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 01:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    nimi "ala lon" li seme a, jan Diriector_Doc o? -- wan Tansin[kala sona o lon] (ona/ona) 01:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    mi pakala. mi lili. --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 01:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Forigi. toki pona ëa ðyt pejor con-langue. dudhhrContribs 01:16, 1 April 2022 (UTC) (edit conflict)[reply]
  • (ante pilin ante suli) Lon pali, moli ni lukin kiwen. Ala pona. — 3PPYB6 — TOKI — ANTE — 01:23, wan tenpo mun nanpa po 2022 (UTC)
    "(change of feeling of change of size) Reality of work, death of this of eye of stone. Nothing of good."???? -- wan Tansin[kala sona o lon] (ona/ona) 01:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tamzin—Sama sina pini la sona, mi jo kin ike Toki Pona sona. — 3PPYB6 — TOKI — ANTE — 01:46, wan tenpo mun nanpa po 2022 (UTC)
  • o weka a! toki ni li nasa, li ike. jan li toki ala e ni. anu ken la jan pi mute lili li toki lili e ni. taso jan ni li nasa. sina wile ala lon poki poka ona. -- wan Tansin[kala sona o lon] (ona/ona) 01:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC) (ante pona 05:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC): sina wile ala lon poka a ona. taso kin sina wile ala lon poki ona...)[reply]
    toki ni li lon ma Papuwanijukini anu seme? ni la jan ala li pilin. QoopyQoopy (talk) 05:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @QoopyQoopy—Ala ma jo ni toki sama ona lawa toki. Ona li taso wan toki pali tan jan, lon seme mute jan toki. — 3PPYB6 — TOKI — ANTE — 13:45, wan tenpo mun nanpa po 2022 (UTC)
    "This possesses earthly nothingness like they of spoken laws. They dutifully spokenly unitedly make alone. On what spoken person's amount?" sina wile kama sona toki pona la, o toki tawa mi. taso sina ken ala linja e nimi pona sama nasin pi nimi Inli. ni li nasa -- wan Tansin[kala sona o lon] (ona/ona) 19:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tamzin—Sina awen mute pona Toki Pona suli mi. Pona pali. — 3PPYB6 — TOKI — ANTE — 01:41, wan tenpo mun nanpa po 2022 (UTC)
  • Bórrese porque es un idioma terrible. —C++coder (Merry Xmas!!! | talk | talk but in italics) 01:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • .i .au vimcu .i lo bangu poi se notci ti na zasti .i be'i la'o ty tbodt ty to fi'o ve snusku la'o ty talk ty toi ti'u lirepi'ereno de'i li renorerepi'evopi'epa
  • Ishiliet. Toki Pona anen, etza meitel shmen, ram dern treil arikes min das bakashak. Is hauess az Wikipedia os as esidthashuł, am omo ham mełoskarol luskas lesas byutzizas ad haliob id mełoskaroles hel vai treil isass fur zes arikes, oor Kankonik, o au vai hel isass zes arikes, oor Yiklamu Didelik. Khemehekis (talk) 03:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nai keśite Namai fu afto glossa — «Toki Pona», de sor mus je braa. De, afto lehti nai treng keśite. Li afto lehti keśite, hör andrdźin lera cui afto braa glossa? Hei mir deki nai! Vi mus nai keśite afto lehti. AmberWing1352 (hanuda) 4:24 ZD, 1d. 4m. 2022t (UTC).
  • awen. toki pona li toki pona la, lipu ni li pona kin. sina ken ala a toki e ni tawa mi: ni li lon ala! ona li lon suli. jan tu tu (toki) tenpo 04:39, suno musi pi tenpo sike 2022 (UTC)
  • weka - jan li ken ala toki ale kepeken nimi mute lili. toki ni li lon ala. QoopyQoopy (talk) 04:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    toki ni li lon ala la, mi toki kepeken toki seme lon tenpo ni? o awen... tan mi pilin pona ala... jan tu tu (toki) tenpo 05:36, suno musi pi tenpo sike 2022 (UTC)
    jan tu tu o ala ala a! mi ala ala a la sina ala ala ala? a! ala o ala. -- wan Tansin[kala sona o lon] (ona/ona) 05:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    lipu ni li weka la mi mute li ala. ala la mi mute li pona. QoopyQoopy (talk) 05:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    tawa mi tan kon tu pi nimi "ala la" la toki nanpa tu sina li jo e kon ni: "mi mute li ala la, mi mute li pona." a a a. -- wan Tansin[kala sona o lon] (ona/ona) 06:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hučʰawelıţ. Eıčnàlüd pı eluıšqımžöčukt, uëň al-lwöralîl ûtan-n eloexhtoks _upeal Iţkuîl. {{u|Bowler the Carmine}} (he/him | talk) 06:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • weka. toki ni li ike! mi ken ala toki e "chemistry" (toki Inli) kepeken ni! --jan Maku (toki) 07:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, but recategorize to Category:Language games, sorted a little above Pig Latin. Sobsz (talk) 10:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quiero comentar. Nosotros todavía estamos usando esta Toki Pona idioma, pero esta página dice a eliminar esta idioma. Solo quería confirmar. — 3PPYB6 — DISCUSIÓN — CONTRIBS. — 13:10, 1 abril 2022 (UTC)
  • ... ఒక మాట, ఒకోక మాట ఈ "మంచి భాష" తొ, నా జీవి, నా కుటుంబ జీవి, సంతోషం, మనసు ఆరోగ్యం, మొత్తం గ్యారంటీ! బి రెఢీ! గెట్ స్టెడీ! టోకి పోనీ పొవు లేదు! తగ్గేదే లే! MSG17 (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • ಆ ಫೆಲ್ಲೋ, ಒಂದು ತುಂಬಾ ಬೇಜಾರು ಮಗ. ವಿಕಿಪೀಡಿಯಾ ಬನ್ ಮಾಡಬೆಕ್! MSG17 (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • टोकीपोना नाम सुनके भाषा समझे क्या? भाषा नहीं, फायर है मैं! ActuallyNeverHappened02 (a place to chalk | a list of stuff i've done) 17:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was hoax. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bird

AfDs for this article:
Bird (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:Hoax, and the government is lying too MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 00:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was happy birthday! April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subaru Natsuki

Subaru Natsuki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason PeteStacman24 (talk) 00:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone brought up Nagatoro's birthday, and that reminded me: it's also Subaru's birthday as well! And as the ultimate present, I have decided to damn him to the endless abyss by nominating to kill his article. Now I get to hang out with Emilia. Happy Birthday! 🥳

(stupid cars never did a damn for me) --PeteStacman24 (talk) 00:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was non-notable as I haven't seen it. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 1900

February 1900 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Every fourth year is usually a leap year. The only exceptions are the "00" years. Most such years are not leap years, but the ones divisible by 400 (such as 1600, 2000, 2400, and 2800) are. None of us were born in the 1800s, so delete this and do not recreate it until February 2100, the next time February in a multiple-of-4 year will be a day shorter than in most other such years. [April Fools!] GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was sound effects stuck in my head. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mario (given name)


Mario (given name) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violates our copyright violations against Nintendo. I think it's time to boot MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 00:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Dislike . (non-admin closure) —GMX(ping!) 00:59, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like

Like (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:IDONTLIKEIT.[April Fools!] ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's offensive to my religion. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 00:52, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Per NPOV, if we're gonna delete this, we should delete Dislike too. Cool guy (talk • contribs) • he/they 01:52, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Letter (alphabet). April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Number

Number (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Numbers? I'd prefer writing out the numbers instead!! [April Fools!] --AlphaBetaOneHundredThirtyFive (talk) ZeroZero:FourFour, One April TwoThousandTwentyTwo (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was boring shape. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GameCube

GameCube (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cubes are a pretty boring shape. Why couldn't they have chosen something different, like an icosahedron? GameTriangle (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move to GameUrMom TheScottish801 (talk) 10:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to the Main Page. (non-admin closure) — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 01:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

AfDs for this article:
Wikipedia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Let's get this over with. Marioedit8 (talk) 00:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was teasing. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Toy with Me, Miss Nagatoro


Don't Toy with Me, Miss Nagatoro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's Nagatoro's birthday today! Happy birthday Nagatoro! What better way to celebrate her birthday than deleting her show's article? [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was abolish. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Monarchy of Barbados


Monarchy of Barbados (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barbados recently abolished its monarchy in favor of establishing a republic, so it also makes sense for us to also abolish our article on Barbados' now non-existent monarchy. Maybe in the not-so-distant future we can delete Commonwealth realm as well. [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Barbados is now a sovereign republic with a new leader, no more queens or something monarchy things to have or to do of. Xinghua (she/her) • Talk 00:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Result Is Keep (non-admin closure) 💜  melecie  talk - 00:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Baba Is You

Baba Is You (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page Is Delete [April Fools!] 💜  melecie  talk - 00:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was frightening. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Galileo Galilei

Galileo Galilei (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Thunderbolts and lightning, very very frightening me! Helen(💬📖) 00:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The real question is will scaramouche do the fandango? If not then delete. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 20:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result was Punctuation added. (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 14:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation


PunctuationedittalkhistoryprotectdeletelinkswatchlogsviewsView AfDeditssincenomination
FindsourcesGooglebooksnewsscholarfreeimagesWPRefsFENSJSTORNYTWPLibrary

LikewhocameupwiththisinthefirstplacetheEnglishlanguageissomuchbetteroffwithoutitAprilFools3PPYB6TALKCONTRIBS00001April2022UTC

AutomatedcommentThisAfDwasnotcorrectlytranscludedtothelogstep3IhavetranscludedittoWikipediaArticles for deletion/Log/2022April1cyberbot ITalktomyownerOnline00201April2022UTC
firstPanini🚢00381April2022UTC
DeletepunctuationisbadwhywouldweeverneedsuchathingLink20XXtalk00551April2022UTC
actuallylookslikethemindgamewasthetruefirstarticleMainPeanuttalk00551April2022UTC
MergeWithCamelCaseDiriectorDoc01221April2022UTC
DeletepunctuationisthemainreasonifailedtheenglishtestsosuchanarticlecanneverexisthereKpddgtalkcontribs02291April2022UTC
DeleteifanyoneactuallyneedspunctuationsthencomeovertothelastpageofapicklefortheknowingonesFehufangaTalk08141April2022UTC
KeepItriedtoreadwithoutpunctuationbeforeandithurtmyeyesweneedtokeeppunctuationsothatwedonotgocrazyNarutolovehinata5talkcontributions09491April2022UTC
DeleteIsavedsomuchtimebynotusinganypunctuationLemonLimetalktalk11451April2022UTC
DeleteNownobodycansayIkeepusingcommasplicesaswellasusesemicolonsincorrectlyyay💜melecietalk13:001April2022UTC
CommentwhydoescyberbotkeepplacingtheAFDtemplatequestionmarkthisiskindaseriousactuallyFehufangaTalk13161April2022UTC
DeleteremovingpunctuationissenselessandwillprobablymakealltheenglishteachersverymadDisoneiscool8745talk13291April2022UTC
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) 👨🏻‍💻 Rng0286 (☎️ talk) ✍️ conts ;) IT APRIL FOOL’S DAY (not anymore)! (☑️ rights) D'oh! 00:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Backrooms

The Backrooms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete this non-Euclidean liminal space per WP:IDONTLIKEIT and also WP:HOAX [April Fools!] --AlphaBeta135 (talk) 00:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • G12, Antichamber existed first and has the rights to impossible geometry. I do want to point out (seriously) that it's a misuse of "non-Euclidean", though; actual non-Euclidean geometry wouldn't have your standard rectangles with four 90° angles like is shown in that article. HotdogPi 13:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • sv_cheats 1, noclip RteeeeKed💬📖 21:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was this nomination lost the game. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 10:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Game (mind game)

AfDs for this article:
The Game (mind game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Terrible game, I can't even win it. Gitting gud is not an option. And while I'm at it let's nominate User:Melecie too for basically being the same page [April Fools!] 💜  melecie  talk - 00:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Windows is better. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Linux

Linux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Windows 10 for it is now merely a component of the latter. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • What you are referring to as Wikipedia, is in fact, MediaWiki/Wikipedia, or as I've been recently been taking to calling it, MediaWiki plus Wikipedia. GameTriangle (talk) 01:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as MediaWiki, is in fact, GNU/Wikipedia/Linux/Windows/MacOS/Android/MediaWiki/Wikipedia, or as I've recently been taking to call it, GNU plus Wikipedia plus Linux plus Windows plus MacOS plus Android plus MediaWiki plus Wikipedia. —GMX(ping!) 01:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was failed WP:GNG. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Yang


Andrew Yang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Lamestream media did not pay much attention to him during the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries. That must mean he fails WP:GNG. Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Xbox Series X and Series S. April fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PlayStation 5


PlayStation 5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's always out of stock. We must keep the article deleted until it's re-stocked so that people won't think it's in stock, only to be disappointed. [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You know you can just tape a PS3 and a PS2 together, right? GameTriangle (talk) 00:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was distraction. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (film)

Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason PeteStacman24 (talk) 00:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most unfortunately, this film is due for release on April 8th, which interferes with Rex Manning Day. As Rex Manning Day is a national holiday worldwide, we must be rid of this page as to not distract from the joyous occasion.[April Fools!]

  • Keep. Rex Manning Day must be deleted, as it conflicts with the 2024 solar eclipse, also on April 8, which is a much more important event. HotdogPi 14:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. this may be a prank AfD, however the movie hasnt released yet, shouldnt we at least draftify it until april 8th to avoid WP:CRYSTALBALL issues? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PerryPerryD (talk • contribs) 19:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Super Vote Delete. Trying to upgrade to Windows 11 bricked my computer; this isn't a joke. –JJP ‐Talk‐☖ 21:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Windows 11

AfDs for this article:
Windows 11 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's just a modern Windows Vista, only with even more ads and tracking.[April Fools!] Marioedit8 (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Haven't had any problems with it since upgrading at launch, and it's helpful, so Redirect to Ace Hardware because I'm secretly sponsored by them. —GMX(ping!) 00:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no original research. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Research

Research (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted per WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOR. [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, citing "What is Original Research? Original research is considered a primary source". Thomas G. Carpenter Library, University of North Florida. Archived from the original on 9 July 2011. Retrieved 9 August 2014. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 01:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was
⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ K E E P S
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ D R A F T
🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ M O V E D
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 M E R G E

I guess Merge. –JJP ‐Talk‐☖ 21:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wordle

Wordle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Boring! I prefer the knock-off versions. Also, has anyone figured out today’s Wordle yet? I can’t seem to figure this out for some reason... [April Fools!] --AlphaBeta135 (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply] 

Wordle 401 5/6
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛️
🟨⬛️🟩⬛️⬛️
⬛️🟨🟩⬛️🟩
🟨🟩🟩⬛️🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Whew, tricky one! —C++coder (Merry Xmas!!! | talk | talk but in italics) 01:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HARRY or Stove for two possibilities on the same day. Plus I got in in two tries:- Wordle 286 2/6

⬜⬜🟩🟩⬜

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 14:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Aw, I took 4...

Wordle 286 4/6

🟩⬜🟩🟨⬜

🟩⬜🟩⬜🟨

🟩⬜🟩🟩🟩

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

InvalidOStalk 16:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was green light. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Squid Game

Squid Game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A game that involves playing Red Light, Green Light with Circus Baby (i.e. WP:IDONTLIKEIT)! Worth noting that it has nothing to do with the 2015 version of Squid Game... [April Fools!] --AlphaBeta135 (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:HOAX. Too absurd to actually exist! ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
SQUID GAMES ‼ Uncle Ben💬📖 20:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Sus ඞ. (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 14:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Among Us

Among Us (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ඞඞඞ “Stop posting about Among Us! I'm tired of seeing it!” -biggayrapper ඞඞඞ [April Fools!] --AlphaBeta135 (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • NFCCs the icon that was sent by the IP because it is of copyright; Delete I don't want to see this anymore, it gives us hysteria. Xinghua (she/her) • Talk 01:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD —C++coder (Merry Xmas!!! | talk | talk but in italics) 01:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Sus. jp×g 07:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Eject Waaaaaaaaay sus. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 10:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    █ █ █ █
    █ █ █ █ █
    █ █ █ █ █ █
    █ █ █ █ █ █
    █ █ █ █ █
    █ █ █ █
    █ █ █ █ 172.112.210.32 (talk) 14:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Stop posting about Amogus sussy baka imposter sus red where yellow where sus vent 50.86.121.132 (talk) 14:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 🗿🗿🗿🗿. April fools is over. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New York City


New York City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too many moais in this city. They all need to be exterminated. 🗿 🗿 🗿 [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

🗿 💜  melecie  talk - 00:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿 Epicgenius (talk) 00:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/94th Academy Awards (2nd nomination) (non-admin closure) 👨🏻‍💻 Rng0286 (☎️ talk) ✍️ conts ;) IT APRIL FOOL’S DAY (not anymore)! (☑️ rights) D'oh! 00:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

94th Academy Awards


94th Academy Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Less of an awards show and more like a slapfest. We need to protect the children and delete the article, lest more people decide to slap people who make fun of their spouses. [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Chalkboard (typeface) (non-admin closure) 💜  melecie  talk - 00:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comic Sans


Comic Sans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's already widely regarded as the worst font, we should delete it and everything associated with it. Also including the following article for the same reason:

[4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was cancelled. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

E3 2022


E3 2022 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It got canceled so it doesn't need an article. Either that or it gets redirected to Summer Game Fest or The Game Awards. [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - you summed up my thoughts entirely. XtraJovial (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was slap with trout. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Will Smith


Will Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:SLAP. [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Right-click (non-admin closure) 💜  melecie  talk - 00:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non-fungible token


Non-fungible token (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably the most useless and wasteful invention in the history of mankind. The article is also pointless and can easily be right-clicked. Let's just end this whole mess once and for all. That or we turn the article or the nomination into an NFT. Another option is moving the article to Non-flushable turd. [4-1] Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Blow up with WP:TNT and then redirect to Uranus. That should fix the problem. 00:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was if you're not first, you're last! (non-admin closure) MainPeanut (talk) 15:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First

First (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)

It’s so annoying to always see “first” comments on YouTube videos. No one cares! - MainPeanut (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Annoying comments like this have no place on Wikipedia. (P.S. 28th comment is the best comment) Lemon & Lime (talk) (talk) 07:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete because it doesn’t exist. (non-admin closure) 👨🏻‍💻 Rng0286 (☎️ talk) ✍️ conts ;) IT APRIL FOOL’S DAY (☑️ rights) D'oh! 00:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Planet of the Apes

Planet of the Apes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apes. It was a planet, a culture and a species. Goron (talk) 01:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete It's not an official planet. It is a fictional one. It was a planet, but not any longer, it's just the home planet of the apes, and not the only one. It is just a random planet, not even mentioned. --NerdyDrew talk (contribs) 02:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'm a planetary scientist. I've never heard of this, so I couldn't even be asked. It's a fictional planet, so it should probably be deleted. Sorry if I came off as rude, I didn't mean to. It might be worth noting that this article was created as a part of a school project, so don't take it as a personal offence. --NerdyDrew talk (contribs) 03:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Milky Way: Both articles contain similar information, and Milky Way should contain a reference to its namesake. --AllegedlyHuman (talk) 03:24, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The galaxy is made up of many billions of stars, and many planets are in the galaxy. But, a random planet would not be notable. --Arth (talk) 03:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete It is a name of a planet, with nothing in the article and it's not an official planet. --Shaniqua (talk) 03:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But, there is an official planet name -- Sedna. --Jimboparker (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
But, there is an official planet name -- Sedna. --Jimboparker (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Barthes was a French literary theorist and writer. If there is a name for a planet, it should be his. --YoshitakaAoki (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Barthes was a French literary theorist and writer. If there is a name for a planet, it should be his. --YoshitakaAoki (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Dostoyevsky was a Russian literary theorist and writer. If there is a name for a planet, it should be his. --NerdyDrew (talk) 06:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Dostoyevsky was a Russian literary theorist and writer. If there is a name for a planet, it should be his. --NerdyDrew (talk) 06:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have to disagree on this one. Dostoyevsky is still considered the greatest writer of tragedy, so that name still has value to people. There is already a name for the planet though, and it is considered the greatest of the Planets - Neptune. --Jimboparker (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree on this one. Dostoyevsky is still considered the greatest writer of tragedy, so that name still has value to people. There is already a name for the planet though, and it is considered the greatest of the Planets - Neptune. --Jimboparker (talk) 07:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Heyer was a writer and film director. If there is a name for a planet, it should be his. --NerdyDrew (talk) 11:35, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Heyer was a writer and film director. If there is a name for a planet, it should be his. --NerdyDrew (talk) 11:35, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is my first real thought. The planet "Heyer" would make a good name, but it has nothing to do with the other planet. Heyer was an English playwright of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. --Jimboparker (talk) 15:21, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is my first real thought. The planet "Heyer" would make a good name, but it has nothing to do with the other planet. Heyer was an English playwright of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. --Jimboparker (talk) 15:21, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to add this as a second option if I can convince Jimbo, a good author to help name a planet. Heyer has a good name for a planet because it is a real planet. "Heyer" is one of the most searched for names on Google for planets. It is a good choice but I think it's missing something, such as "Heyer". If anyone else has any other suggestions, please vote, or leave a comment.--Jimboparker (talk) 03:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm on your side with this one, if I understand. * The real world Heyer made some great movies (such as "A Room With A View"). : I'm for this, but I do not know if this suggestion will be accepted. --JoaquínRojas (talk) 17:14, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I like your suggestion. * Heyer has some very good works. --StarZinc (talk) 23:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It is a planet and it has only one entry, with no description, but a AllegedlyHuman could create one for it if he wanted. It's even the same planet as Delete, which would be an even worse collision. Arsgo 21:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It is the name of a planet and it has a description and an image, so it should be fine. Just a suggestion. Tk1.1 19:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral It is a planet name. Not sure why it is here, but it's not. Tk1.1 19:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral It is the name of a planet and it has a description and an image, so it should be fine. Just a suggestion. Tk1.1 19:34, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moderator The wiki says you are "deleted" from Earth. Please come back so we can add this planet to the list of planets. Waldorf 12:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moderator The wiki says you are "deleted" from Earth. Please come back so we can add this planet to the list of planets. Waldorf 12:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Please merge Milky Way with the Milky Way page. Oli (talk) 02:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The Wiki states that the "planet is named after the galaxy it's in, which is the Milky Way". However, there are many other Milky Ways. A galaxy is a large group of stars and the Milky Way is just one of them. —Sydl0v (talk) 06:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Milky Way I think there is enough information here to make it a single entry. --Xanatos (talk) 11:07, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A planet without a moons should not have a name. What are we calling Earth, anyway? --Jdawg (talk) 06:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The wiki currently says that the Moon is named after the planet Saturn, and "the planet is named after the Moon". Since Saturn isn't a planet, that's incorrect. I recommend merging Moon with Saturn. --NerdyDrew (talk) 11:43, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The wiki currently says the Moon is named after Saturn. That's technically true, but not what the title of the article should say. The title should say "Moon is named after the planet Saturn." --Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 16:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge There is not a lot of information on the Earth right now. I think the name of the planet should be combined with that of the moon, to form Earth. --Arth (talk) 03:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If you're merging planets and moons, then why not merge Earth with Mars? The Wiki says that Mars is named after the planet, but, that's wrong. (Mars is named after the god Mars, because it's an abbreviation of Mars Red Planet.) I recommend merging Earth and Mars. --Arth (talk) 03:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The wiki currently says the moon is named after the planet Saturn. That's technically true, but not what the title of the article should say. The title should say "Moon is named after the planet Saturn." --Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 17:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I agree with Xanatos (talk). I think the current title is not correct. The title should be "moon is named after planet Saturn". --Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 18:13, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge I am not going to be the merger for this wiki but I thought you should know. My thoughts are that a more appropriate title is "Moon is named after planet Saturn". --Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 18:23, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Please do not delete the planet Pluto. It is named after a god and is a moon of a planet. It is one of the coolest things in the solar system. Oli (talk) 12:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don't think the name "Earth" should be in the name of the planet, that is the name of the planet that is on the Earth. Shouldn't it be "Earth Planet" or "Planet Earth"? --Kris_in_Korea (talk) 19:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As of 17:20 UTC, I've deleted the moon of Uranus. I'm also deleting the other moons of Uranus, just for simplicity's sake. --Alfred Wegener (talk) 17:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As the moon and the planet are named after a god, they should have the name of that god as well as the name of the other. In this case, that would be Jupiter. I'm sorry for the short-hand, but it's a more useful name than either of those, IMHO. --Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge The current title does not make sense because it has the same problems of the other articles of Jupiter, Mars, etc. I think the title should be "moon is named after planet Jupiter" --Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Pelvis, a better title would be "moon is named after planet Jupiter." --Arth (talk) 03:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I think the Moon is named after the planet Jupiter, it's just that the wiki should be updated to state that the name of the planet comes after the name of the moon. Therefore, the title should be "Jupiter is named after the moon." --Arth (talk) 03:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think the name of the Moon is the correct one. The Moon is named after a god, and should be renamed accordingly. I'm sorry if I was not clear about this. The title should be "Jupiter is named after the moon" --Arth (talk) 03:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think the name of the Moon is the correct one. The Moon is named after a god, and should be renamed accordingly. I'm sorry if I was not clear about this. The title should be "Jupiter is named after the moon" --Arth (talk) 03:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I have already suggested Earth's name be deleted, which is why it is not included here. I am also not going to be the merger for this wiki. Please remove the following: A title with "Jupiter" as the planet and the name of the moon is "Jupiter is named after the moon" or "Jupiter is the moon's name". --Oli (talk) 13:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I agree with Oli (talk). I think the current title is not correct. The title should be "Jupiter is named after the moon". --Arth (talk) 15:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
JUPITER IS NOT NAMED AFTER THE MOON. The planet Jupiter is named after the god of the Roman pantheon, Jupiter. So the correct title should be "Jupiter is named after the moon.". --Oli (talk) 13:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oops, must have accidentally turned on my AI bot while drafting an AFD. Sorry, won't happen again!!—GMX(ping!) 23:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Rename to Planet of the Statues of Liberties The Statue of Liberty is just so awesome we should have like an entire planet of them. Like can you imagine it, a Statue of Liberty every hundred feet. How awesome would that be? (I can already feel the freedom intensifying). Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Statue of Liberty has had amity gates on the U.S./Canada border for decades, so that people can easily cross the border on their way to visit it. It makes me wonder if you can make more gate like that in the EU, since you can't go anywhere there without going through one of those Europei rail passes. - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 02:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the same vein as the previous statuse of liberty idea, in the Netherlands there is a statue of liberty in the middle of the Scheveningen beach. I'm not sure if it is possible to get into the statue but I sure as heck would like to take a walk in front of it and take a picture while I have a beer in my hand - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 02:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've always wondered why there was a statue of Liberty in New Jersey - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 03:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Statue of Liberty is a historical symbol that stands tall for freedom and democracy. But what happens when you're a tiny island nation without great resources like, say, New Zealand? Do you just stand there proudly for one reason or two? --Zerachiel (talk) 04:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • New Zealand, as you can tell, has much more natural resources than that. The Statue of Liberty is a national icon that stands for freedom and democracy. The New Zealand Herald has a history of publishing [[spoiler: the true story of the Dalmatian War Dogs]]. - Zerachiel (talk) 04:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sure that the Statue of Liberty will look great in black-and-white. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to make a B&W image from a color one. - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 05:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh wait, it's black-and-white. I think I'll just save the black-and-white image, and color it in Paint. My color-blindness means that I don't actually know what color images look like. - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 05:29, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are several other statues of liberty here in New Zealand. - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 06:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hans Island has several Statue of Liberty's on its beach. - Loren D. (— talk) (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • There's more than one Statue of Liberty in New Zealand. The original statue in New York's harbor, but there is a second statue on the Pukehou, New Zealand beach at the northern tip of the North Island. There's another one on the South Island near Christchurch. And a few others scattered around the country. Ookami (talk) 19:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I never realized there was a second Statue of Liberty in New Zealand. Ookami (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just because there's several statues of Liberty throughout the country doesn't necessarily mean that all of them are the same. The North Island has the [War Dogs] and the South Island has the [of Liberty]. - Ookami (talk) 19:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are several statues of Liberty in NZ, but they do not resemble the Statue of Liberty, as most are much shorter. - Tjes (talk) 01:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually there are several. There's the one in Auckland, New Zealand and there's another one in Christchurch, New Zealand. - Tjes (talk) 05:06, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oof. This is embarrassing. Went to bed and when I was asleep my computer had turned itself on and ran the bot! I'm going to disable it for now. Sorry for the trouble. —GMX(ping!) 01:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure which of the two is correct and which of the two is incorrect. I did not see either one of them before. --Mtnpier (talk) 09:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think both are correct, one because it is the planet, and the other because it is the moon's name. And one of them could be edited. --Mtnpier (talk) 12:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
JUPITER IS NOT NAMED AFTER THE MOON. The planet Jupiter is named after the god of the Roman pantheon, Jupiter. So the correct title should be "Jupiter is named after the moon". --Oli (talk) 13:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that there is no error with either. If you feel otherwise, you should probably state so somewhere in the text of the article. There are no changes, as far as I know. (And the fact that the article states "Jupiter's name comes from Greek" just means it was Greek mythology, not Roman mythology. And if you were to remove the sentence "Jupiter's name comes from Greek", the article would still be correct.) --Mtnpier (talk) 09:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Oli. It is incorrect. --Lancelot (talk) 04:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Sorry, not a good one either. I believe "Jupiter is named after the planet Jupiter." would be a correct statement. --Lancelot (talk) 03:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The names of the other planets and their moons should be deleted to clarify that the naming of the planet and moon isn't arbitrary. --Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The names of the other planets and their moons should be deleted to clarify that the naming of the planet and moon isn't arbitrary. --Arth (talk) 02:36, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree also. --Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 08:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agree also. Since then, I have created a stub which describes the naming of Jupiter and its moon. --Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 08:12, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Jupiter is named after the god of the Roman pantheon, Jupiter Jupiter's name is a contraction of Greek (Io, meaning '"to be'", not "I",) for Zeus, the king of the gods in Greek mythology, which in turn was taken from an early name for the planet Jupiter (Zeus is the Greek for "king"). --Lancelot (talk) 04:23, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Um, the angry apes need to have a word with you... Lovable98158 (talk) Lovable98158 20:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Returned after a 5 year long coma... my accidental bot run turned into an active war zone. The apes are fighting with other apes, Russian obelisks, long-defunct cycler groups, batteries, Sinebot and more... The robot revolution hasn't started yet, but it could at any time... I have no idea on how we could keep the apes and the Russian obelisks away... I guess this is goodbye...
Unless, UNLESS, UNLESSSSSSS... I use the powerful strength of the bots... to create a powerful force field... that repels obliesks away... and allows us to stay... right where we belong???.....
I don't think this is the perfect solution... I only have <1hr to do this... and it's the only remotely feasible way to keep the world alive... But you know what... I'll try it right now... Atleast before I slip back up into a coma...
...tap... Alright. The bots shou-...... coma intensifies —GMX(ping!) 23:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete Jupiter is named after the planet Jupiter. --Oli (talk) 19:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if this is in the right place, but I did recently add this to Jupiter to be, but I'm not 100% sure this is where it belongs. I know that Wikipedia requires it to be in a category, but Jupiter isn't a planet in the usual sense of the word. I don't think it should be in the category of planets. It should be in a category of its own like the moon. So I think that should probably be moved. Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 11:49, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the double-post, but I added another change as well... I think that the title should be "Jupiter is named after the planet Jupiter". That's my current opinion on the matter. --Lancelot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Agree Jupiter is named after the planet Jupiter. --Lancelot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the change. It's a real planet and it should be referred to that way. Not a moon, not a planet or star, not a mythological creature, not a space rock. It's a planet. --Lancelot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add As of August 2011, Jupiter has nine moons named after ancient Roman gods: Io, Europa, Ganymede, Callisto, Amalthea, Pasiphae, Amalthea, Tethys, and Metis. --Lancelot (talk) 06:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I've had a look at that section, and the "Ganymede was the brother of Zeus, and was a mortal hero. He was later turned into a beautiful white-gold apple tree by the god Hermes" part needs to be fixed. Ganymede wasn't a hero, but a youth of the moon in Greek mythology. --Jared (talk) 05:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don't see a need for the section. No-one is suggesting there were other planets at the time, the naming is arbitrary, and not only that but any mention of the naming in relation to the naming of the planet is just plain wrong. --Jared (talk) 05:18, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete I agree that there is no need for a section on the naming of the planets. Any mention of it would be wrong. --Jared (talk) 05:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I will support this suggestion if this is what the consensus is. --Jared (talk) 13:07, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Names of planets and their moons: I don't see the need to have a section on the naming of the planets and their moons. It's the same case as the naming of Mars or Saturn. If we need to explain that, we should do that in articles dedicated to those planets. As Jupiter is the largest planet of the solar system, the case is the same as the planet Jupiter. The article Jupiter only explain its physical properties and history, we don't need any further explanation. If any further information is needed, just create an article devoted to the subject. — Pelvis of the Moontalk (talk) 22:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • It was suggested above that the section should be deleted. This suggests that the consensus is to have a section on the naming of the planets. I agree with this suggestion. --Jared (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • This suggestion is not just for Mars and Saturn. There is also the case of the naming of the Sun and Moon. In this case, they are named after Greek gods, but they are not named after Roman gods, which is why there is a section on the naming of the planets. --Jared (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • The Sun and the Moon are named after the Greek god Zeus and Hera, respectively. So, they are named after gods from Greek mythology. If this is not the case, there is no need to have a section on the naming of the planets. --Jared (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • There are several naming conventions on Earth: for example, Pluto and Uranus are named after Roman gods, Mars is named after the god of war, Venus is named after a goddess, the Moon is named after a moon goddess, and so on. So, the names of planets and moons are not arbitrary. I agree with this suggestion. --Jared (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The idea was to add one section on the naming of the planets. I agree with this idea, we need this section. --Jared (talk) 15:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete' This section is not needed. If there is any need to know about these other names, they are referenced in the Table of Naming Conventions section of the article Mars. If any further information is needed, just create an article dedicated to the subject. --Pelvis of the Moontalk (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would like to support this deletion. There is no need for this section because the naming of the planets is well documented, and has no place in a listing of names. Just a note that Jupiter was named after the Roman god Jupiter, and not Jupiter the king. — Jared (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete' This section is not needed. If there is any need to know about these other names, they are referenced in the Table of Naming Conventions section of the article Mars. If any further information is needed, just create an article dedicated to the subject. --Pelvis of the Moontalk (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This section is not needed because its contents are already listed in the Table of Naming Conventions. --Jared (talk) 09:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The naming of planets and their moons are not listed in the Table of Naming Conventions. If any further information is needed, just create an article dedicated to the subject. --Pelvis of the Moontalk (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete' The content of this section is redundant with the content of the Table of Naming Conventions. If any further information is needed, just create an article dedicated to the subject. --Pelvis of the Moontalk (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete Jupiter is named after the planet Jupiter. --Oli (talk) 19:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if this is in the right place, but I did recently add this to Jupiter to be, but I'm not 100% sure this is where it belongs. I know that Wikipedia requires it to be in a category, but Jupiter isn't a planet in the usual sense of the word. I don't think it should be in the category of planets. It should be in a category of its own like the moon. So I think that should probably be moved. Pelvis of the Moon (talk) 11:49, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the double-post, but I added another change as well... I think that the title should be "Jupiter is named after the planet Jupiter". That's my current opinion on the matter. --Lancelot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Agree Jupiter is named after the planet Jupiter. --Lancelot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the change. It's a real planet and it should be referred to that way. Not a moon, not a planet or star, not a mythological creature, not a space rock. It's a planet. --Lancelot (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add As of August 2011, Jupiter has nine moons named after ancient Roman gods: Io, Europa, Ganymede, Callisto, Amalthea, Pasiphae, Amalthea, Tethys, and Metis. --Lancelot (talk) 06:22, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I've had a look at that section, and the "Ganymede was the brother of Zeus, and was a mortal hero. He was later turned into a beautiful white-gold apple tree by the god Hermes" part needs to be fixed. Ganymede wasn't a hero, but a youth of the moon in Greek mythology. --Jared (talk) 05:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don't see a need for the section. No-one is suggesting there were other planets at the time, the naming is arbitrary, and not only that but any mention of the naming in relation to the naming of the planet is just plain wrong. --Jared (talk) 05:18, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete I agree that there is no need for a section on the naming of the planets. Any mention of it would be wrong. --Jared (talk) 05:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I will support this suggestion if this is what the consensus is. --Jared (talk) 13:07, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Names of planets and their moons: I don't see the need to have a section on the naming of the planets and their moons. It's the same case as the naming of Mars or Saturn. If we need to explain that, we should do that in articles dedicated to those planets. As Jupiter is the largest planet of the solar system, the case is the same as the planet Jupiter. The article Jupiter only explain its physical properties and history, we don't need any further explanation. If any further information is needed, just create an article devoted to the subject. — Pelvis of the Moontalk (talk) 22:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • It was suggested above that the section should be deleted. This suggests that the consensus is to have a section on the naming of the planets. I agree with this suggestion. --Jared (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • This suggestion is not just for Mars and Saturn. There is also the case of the naming of the Sun and Moon. In this case, they are named after Greek gods, but they are not named after Roman gods, which is why there is a section on the naming of the planets. --Jared (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • The Sun and the Moon are named after the Greek god Zeus and Hera, respectively. So, they are named after gods from Greek mythology. If this is not the case, there is no need to have a section on the naming of the planets. --Jared (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • There are several naming conventions on Earth: for example, Pluto and Uranus are named after Roman gods, Mars is named after the god of war, Venus is named after a goddess, the Moon is named after a moon goddess, and so on. So, the names of planets and moons are not arbitrary. I agree with this suggestion. --Jared (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The idea was to add one section on the naming of the planets. I agree with this idea, we need this section. --Jared (talk) 15:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete' This section is not needed. If there is any need to know about these other names, they are referenced in the Table of Naming Conventions section of the article Mars. If any further information is needed, just create an article dedicated to the subject. --Pelvis of the Moontalk (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would like to support this deletion. There is no need for this section because the naming of the planets is well documented, and has no place in a listing of names. Just a note that Jupiter was named after the Roman god Jupiter, and not Jupiter the king. — Jared (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete' This section is not needed. If there is any need to know about these other names, they are referenced in the Table of Naming Conventions section of the article Mars. If any further information is needed, just create an article dedicated to the subject. --Pelvis of the Moontalk (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This section is not needed because its contents are already listed in the Table of Naming Conventions. --Jared (talk) 09:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The naming of planets and their moons are not listed in the Table of Naming Conventions. If any further information is needed, just create an article dedicated to the subject. --Pelvis of the Moontalk (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete' The content of this section is redundant with the content of the Table of Naming Conventions. If any further information is needed, just create an article dedicated to the subject. --Pelvis of the Moontalk (talk) 22:19, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was non-existent. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Character (arts)

Character (arts) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A fictional character does not exist, so WP:HOAX.[April Fools!] ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed to stop discussion about Bruno (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 20:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bruno Madrigal

Bruno Madrigal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We don't talk about Bruno, no, no, no![April Fools!] ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to British Rail Class 43 (Warship Class) as the train disappeared out of thin air TheScottish801 (talk) TheScottish801 (talk) 07:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There are too many characters, but this one guy likes them. (April Fools' Day is over.) (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sonic the Hedgehog characters

AfDs for this article:
List of Sonic the Hedgehog characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One criticism of the Sonic the Hedgehog characters is too many characters, which adds to the series' decline of quality. Nominating for deletion per WP:TOOMUCH and WP:JUNK (for Sonic the Hedgehog and Doctor Eggman, they can safely escape to the main article).[April Fools!] ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was – This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser. . (non-admin closure) —GMX(ping!) 00:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppet account

Sock puppet account (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:SOCKPUPPETRY, so block indefinitely.[April Fools!] ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, send the nomination to SPI instead. Xinghua (she/her) • Talk 00:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can confirm.  Blocked and tagged. Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 00:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clerk rejected close.  Relisted. I re-ran the check on PorkchopGMX and can confirm he is Red X Unrelated. —GMX(ping!) 01:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nyoom. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Racing

Racing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So that us Wikipedians no longer have to race to nominate the most prank-worthy articles first for deletion on a totally normal day.[April Fools!] ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 00:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First. LETS GOOOO. --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 01:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • NNNNNNNNNNNNYYYYYYYYYYRRRRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMMMMM HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHRRRRRRRRRRMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM VVVVVVVVVRRRRRRRRRRRMMMMMMM *SCREEEEECH* Panini! • 🚢 01:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR NYOOM! I WIN THE RACE! Lovable98158 03:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Celeste (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was so long, farewell.[April Fools!] (non-admin closure) --NotReallySoroka (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Celeste (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The game said farewell, so I think it's time to say farewell to the article. Sorry guys :( InvalidOStalk 00:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I still haven't bid my Farewell. also I'm still waiting for the Strawberry Jam mod! 💜  melecie  talk - 00:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was identity theft is not a joke, Jim. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MJL

MJL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It has come to my attention that my real name has never been MJL. You must delete this page immediately!

I was JJPAscendent until JJPMaster stole my identity and robbed me of my memories. Do not trust them. I am the real JJP and always have been. [FBDB] –JJP ‐Talk‐☖ 00:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; Freud is inferior to everyone else. MJLMaster 00:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Execute (non-admin closure) 💜  melecie  talk - 00:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony's poison arrow frog

Anthony's poison arrow frog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This frog is trying to steal everything from me. It has been torturing me. This single frog is the cause of all pain, all suffering, all agony on this planet. It is the incarnation of Satan himself, scorching the earth with its mastery over the abominable magics only one from the deep, burning pits of fire and brimstone could master. This hellish frog has set its sights on me as its sole quarry. It is questionable whether this thing even is a frog. Frogs cannot cause this much harm upon us. This single frog not only has inflicted more suffering than any other species of frog on this entire earth combined, but has dwarfed that by so many orders of magnitude that it is simply unfathomable. We must delete this frog. We must seal it, cast it back into those burning pits that spawned this abominable amphibian. It is a great threat to me, and after it's done with me, it will become a threat to every single person on this planet. InvalidOStalk 00:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Give Anthony his frog back Why does Wikipedia have it anyways? Sunmist (talk) 17:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was I just woke up from a nice sleep, how are you? (non-admin closure) 💜  melecie  talk - 00:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sleep

Sleep (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sleep sucks. It makes us unconscious for a third of our existence. Let's kill it once and for all. Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as I always say, sleep is for the weak... because that's what makes then even stronger 💜  melecie  talk - 00:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete so I can stay awake for the entirety of April Fools. —GMX(ping!) 00:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge both to WikiExcursion. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 02:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitravel


Wikitravel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The existence of Wikitravel hinders the development of Wikivoyage.--SD hehua (talk) 00:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 2.2 released.[April Fools!] –JJP ‐Talk‐☖ 23:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Geometry Dash

Geometry Dash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

2.2 when? 172.112.210.32 (Talk) 00:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made 2 this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 23:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation (disambiguation)

AfDs for this article:
Disambiguation (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not specific enough, too many edits just linked to disambiguation pages![4-1] CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 00:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate. 172.112.210.32 (talk) 00:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was GOD BLESS THESE UNITED STATES AND GOD BLESS AMERICA! –JJP ‐Talk‐☖ 22:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thirteen Colonies

AfDs for this article:
Thirteen Colonies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | Edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In Congress, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Awesome, wow. When your people say they hate you, don't come crawling back to me. King George III! • 🚢 01:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well I'll be damned. Those traitors. Off with their heads, and then delete the article per them spreading lies against us, WP:Hoax. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 01:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was can't find him. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where's Wally?

Where's Wally? (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:HOAX. I've looked at all of the books. I swear he's not there.[April Fools!] --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 01:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was cover with bridge. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rutland

Rutland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

RUTLAND ISNT REAL! Honestly, it's all just in a way better county with a cooler flag. Alsototallydidnotmakethesamejoke2yearsago. An Angry Brit (talk) 01:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and replace with Rutland Railroad which is clearly the primary topic. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Cover with a bridge like the one in Rutland, Massachusetts commons:File:Old_Ironsides_Covered_Bridge,_North_Rutland_MA.jpg HotdogPi 14:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep with trout slaps all around. (non-admin closure) 👨🏻‍💻 Rng0286 (☎️ talk) ✍️ conts ;) IT APRIL FOOL’S DAY (☑️ rights) D'oh! 00:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

94th Academy Awards

AfDs for this article:
94th Academy Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Enough with the Will Smith memes already. MorphinBrony (talk) 01:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Slap MorphinBrony. Keep this darn article out your AfD! --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 01:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fake PTSD on Twitter for clout. oh no I haven't been so le traumatized since January 6 and 9/11 combined MorphinBrony (talk) 01:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Slap MorphinBrony for the second nomination, preferably with a WP:TROUT. OcelotCreeper2 (talk) 01:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is the third time this joke hsa been made per nom. Panini! • 🚢 01:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - This article HIT me hard. The writing really SLAPPED. The greatness of this article really STRUCK me. Koridas (Heyyyyyyy) 03:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for the second nomination, and for all the subsequent nominations, and a multi-slap for everyone participated in the AfD.
 Whack!

You've been collectively whacked with a hover of wet trouts.

Two counts of trout-slaps at all users. – Xinghua (she/her) • Talk 05:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Th following discussion is an archivd dbat of th proposd dltion of th articl blow. Plas do not modify it. Subsqunt commnts should b mad on th appropriat discussion pag (such as th articl's talk pag or in a dltion rviw). No furthr dits should b mad to this pag.

Th rsult was Spdy dlt. Clrly an inappropriat topic for an ncyclopdia (blatant hoax concrning fictional lttr). (non-admin closur) jp×g 07:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

E

E (dit | talk | history | protct | dlt | links | watch | logs | viws) – (Viw AfD | dits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's tim for this lttr to go. W don't nd it anymor. [April Fools!] Bsoyka (talk) 00:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Th abov discussion is an archivd dbat of th proposd dltion of th articl blow. Plas do not modify it. Subsqunt commnts should b mad on th appropriat discussion pag (such as th articl's talk pag or in a dltion rviw). No furthr dits should b mad to this pag.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Got destroyed by Herrscher of Void/Sirin. (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 15:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Honkai Impact 3rd

Honkai Impact 3rd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too much chaos. Delete per WP:CHAOS.[4-1] Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 02:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At least send it to the quantum sea. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 02:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. OINɅƖꞁoꞁ (ʞꞁɐʇ • sqᴉɹʇuoɔ) 04:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Qiqi has fallen. (non-admin closure) Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 15:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Genshin Impact

AfDs for this article:
Genshin Impact (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I lost 50/50 to Qiqi. Delete per WP:LOSE.[4-1] Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 02:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I lost to a weapon My ritual for Venti didn't worked! :( . Also nominating these because of indirect connection:
Ritual (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Manifestation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
I'll get Kazuha instead! 03:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. April fools' day is over. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bruno (name)

Bruno (name) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP: we don’t talk about Bruno. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I would prefer to keep my manhood. Also, consensus sucks because I don't like it. (non-admin closure) Oshawott 12 ==()== Talk to me! 04:33, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Penis

Penis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I thlammed mine in the car door. MorphinBrony (talk) 03:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:OUCH but you shoot yourself in the penis for a whale-like pain. MrMeAndMrMeLet's talk 04:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was "A-G-L-E-T, don't forget it!" April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aglet

Aglet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason: This is the one word that we will always forget to remember even though this was been performed live many times.... delete it!!!![April Fools!] Jhenny38 (Starters talk, My contributions) 03:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Their true purpose is sinister. MorphinBrony (talk) 03:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was cute tiny ears. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:59, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Polar bear

Polar bear (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
if bear not friend, why friend shaped? if bear dangerous, why tiny ears? hm? [April Fools!] AAAAA (AAA AA!) 03:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Convert to Cartesian or rectangular bear (i.e., becomes ). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was engineer gaming. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Engineer

Engineer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

engineer gaming engineer gaming (talk) 04:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Sex
oh no
  • Engineer Gaming Engineer Gaming 💜  Engineer  Gaming - 04:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sap the enemy Sentry for killing me 4 times in a row. ...oh great, our Spy disconnected. RteeeeKed💬📖 22:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was hilarious. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Earth

AfDs for this article:
Earth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This wasn't funny the first time, it wasn't funny the second time, it definitely wasn't funny the eleventh time, and it's not funny now, but that never stopped us before, did it? jp×g 07:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was I don't like it either. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo Switch

AfDs for this article:
Nintendo Switch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PC gaming is more superior. Delete per WP:IDONTLIKEIT.[4-1] Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 15:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
. . (' ). .

The result was ✅. April fools' day is over. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alphabet

Alphabet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)


()

’ . [4-1] – ' ( | ) 02:15, 1 2022 ()

W lrdy dd tht – AssmeGdWrth (tlk | cntrbs) 09:03, 1 Apl 2022 (UTC)
  • Uvuvwevwevwe Onyetenvewve Ugwemubwem Ossas, Kwazawaza Kakukwala Kwaza Kkk Zabolaza. – فيشر (praat) 09:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
⬜🟩🟨🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟨🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 AlphaBeta135 (talk) 22:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • 09:56, 1 2022 (UTC)
  • 4-1 23:59, 1 2022 ()
. . (' ). .
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was replace as it burned out during the discussion. April fools' day is over. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lightbulb

Lightbulb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:A11: the lightbulb was obviously invented.[4-1] Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 14:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was clearly non-existent. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:55, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whale

AfDs for this article:
Whale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obviously misleading. I am F2PBTW.[4-1] Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 14:43, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was condemn to Jimbo's basement. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thou


Thou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We have Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not about YOU, but because that exists, we are missing Wikipedia is not about THEE, in case Shakespeare's ghost is reading Wikipedia. Therefore, we must delete thy article.[April Fools!] CrimsonComputer (talk) 14:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Banish Thou must therefore be condemned to the fires of Jimbo's basement. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 17:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was clear WP:NGOLF fail. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:53, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Jong-il

Kim Jong-il (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Jong-il)

Fails WP:NGOLF, as his golf record has not been ratified. Just because he might have no anus, that doesn't make him notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was revert vandalism. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

AfDs for this article:
Vandalism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:G3 pure vandalism.[4-1] Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 15:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was just connect them. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Subway

New York City Subway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not serve Staten Island. Propose connecting it to the Staten Island Railway.[4-1] Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 16:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was weird. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:27, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Want to Eat Your Pancreas

I Want to Eat Your Pancreas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is disgusting to eat a human pancreas. KaptaşHero (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The clock struck midnight: April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sergey Taboritsky


Sergey Taboritsky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The man will turn Russia into a barren wasteland while looking for Alexei ,so quick, delete this page before the clock strikes midnight, or only God will be able to save Russia! KaptaşHero (talk) 16:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was do nothing. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing


Nothing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blanked page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlySabre (talk • contribs) 18:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was put on Pizza. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pineapple


Pineapple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn’t belong on pizza. SlySabre (talk) 22:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was unreleased. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Half-Life 3


Half-Life 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It doesn’t exist, and it probably ever won’t. SlySabre (talk) 22:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was autobiography. April Fools' Day is over. (Or maybe I have a COI here?) (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brain

Brain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:AUTOBIO.[4-1] MJLMaster 19:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete unless we could get some brainless creatures to make constructive edits on Wikipedia and have them edit this page. RteeeeKed💬📖 21:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Nom's got me there. It is an WP:AUTOBIO. –JJP ‐Talk‐☖ 21:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nintenkeep. April fools is over now. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 08:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nintendo


Nintendo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sega does what Nintendon't. SlySabre (talk) 22:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was the keep result. April Fools' Day is over. (non-admin closure) Bsoyka (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The

AfDs for this article:
The (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Why do we need to speak using words like ""? We can just not use these words and meaning is still understood. Like: Quick brown fox jumps over lazy dog.[4-1] Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 21:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/April_Fools%27_Day_2022_(Part_2)&oldid=1148022174"