Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lois Griffin (politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The argument for deletion is clearly inferior to the grounded reasons for keeping Courcelles 17:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lois Griffin (politician)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable politician. A search on Google, Yahoo! and other search engines yield very little result if any results for the Canadian politician even when Lois Griffin the character from the American TV series Family Guy was filtered out in the search results. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 04:28, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:48, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 11:48, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – First woman named chair of the Toronto Transit Commission, which is a fairly high-profile position in Canada's largest city (see, for example, how much news coverage current chair Karen Stintz receives as a result of her position). The difficulty here is that Google et al will not be able to access much news coverage from the late 1980s and early 1990s. I have access to a database that includes old Toronto Star articles, and I'm finding dozens of hits for "Lois Griffin"+"TTC". I've added a few of the most relevant ones, two of which are fairly lengthy articles entirely about Griffin. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 15:42, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MOS:CA#Municipal politics, Toronto councillors are notable. 117Avenue (talk) 20:23, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd like to request that this discussion be extended beyond the 7 day period to allow for a better consensus. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 02:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.