Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludacious

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 22:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ludacious[edit]

Unsourced and unverifiable dictionary definition of a neologism. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 17:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Mh29255 (talk) 17:11, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears to be an infrequently used nonsense term. Townlake (talk) 18:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Interesting story, but show me the facts. I certainly could not find any. Other than the possible misspelling of the word ludicrous, this seems to fit :-). ShoesssS ^Talk 19:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an unverifiable article about a protologism, which is almost always deleted.--Mizu onna sango15/水女珊瑚15 20:18, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination. US471776 (talk) 21:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete idiocy. JuJube (talk) 01:44, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a unsourced article about a practically nonexistent term. It does not exist on Wiktionary. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 04:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly a made up word derived from Luddite. Isn't an admin going to close this already? M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 04:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete — Rlevse • Talk • 10:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.