Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lumpa Church
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Icewedge (talk) 03:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lumpa Church[edit]
- Lumpa Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete or Merge:
- no sources
- no google results
- perhaps merge into Legion Of Mary?
- Keep Plenty of ghits, including at least one on JSTOR. This article has been here since 2005. Why merge into Legion of Mary? People looking for Lumpa may not know about the Mary connection. There are two external links. Possibly someone could find and post more. Peridon (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep if sources are added. Jofakēt (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A Google search turned up this history of the church: [1]. Pastor Theo (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - multiple hits in academic databases. I'll try to add them. J L G 4 1 0 4 02:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, got a source in there, from an African religion journal. The articles claims are all still pretty hard to verify without more sources. So keep, yes, but also a message asking for more and better sources should be placed on the page until it improves. J L G 4 1 0 4 03:03, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It is clear from the sources presented that sufficient reliable sources exist for notability. Btw, this discussion page seems to be missing the usual heading - could some gnome please fix it? Phil Bridger (talk) 21:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:HEY and WP:V. Bearian (talk) 22:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.