Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machetá

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination Withdrawn‎. I Withdraw this Nomination (Spanish Version of the article has more info& references that can be added to the English Article. (non-admin closure) 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 16:46, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Machetá[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable location, the only 2 sources don't show notability, cited for expansion since 2016. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 03:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - presumed notable per WP:GEOLAND as a populated and legally recognized place. Looks like some Spanish-language sources exist [1], though I can't discern the depth of the coverage or the reliability of said sources. Ping me if something comes up regarding those. estar8806 (talk) ★ 03:57, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Colombia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is nothing wrong with this article that couldn't be fixed by adding some sources, of which there are plenty on the Spanish version. Machetá is vastly more notable than many of the obscure places in the USA that come up regularly in these discussions. Athel cb (talk) 10:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The Spanish WP entry on this town: [2] has a lot of quality references (and some non-quality ones), demonstrating there is a lot that can be said about this place, if someone wants to translate some of the sources. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:34, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.