Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mengly J. Quach Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mengly Jandy Quach. Vanamonde (Talk) 01:18, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mengly J. Quach Foundation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability found. Redirect rejected by article creator: a redirect to Mengly J. Quach Education (which seems to be of limited notability as well) or to Mengly Jandy Quach seems to be warranted, but there isn't enough independent sourcing available here for a stand-alone article. Fram (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. With all due respect, Mengly J. Quach is one of the most notorious philanthropist in Cambodia, whose charitable works are channelled by his Foundation. Check out his Facebook page and his hundreds of thousands of followers if you havn't yet. Countries like Cambodia it is true struggle from a lack of secondary sources and online references. Our ESEAP (South East Asia Pacific) user group is doing it's best to tackel this issue. I am disappointed that as English Wikipedia strives for more inclusivity, smaller countries still struggle to find a place.Willuconquer (talk) 09:19, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Willuconquer: I believe you that this foundation may be important and notable in Cambodia. But as of right now, the sources in the article don't seem to demonstrate that. Do you know of any sources in Khmer which speak in-depth about the foundation? -- 07:22, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More sources are available in Khmer, thank you for enquiring.

"ឧកញា គច មេងល បរចចាគបរមាណ២០មនដលលារ កនងមយឆនាពយាបាលអនកករករ". Cambonomist (in Khmer). 2017-08-23. Retrieved 2021-12-14.
ឧកញាកោះករប (2020-10-23). "មកដងបរវតត លោកឧកញា វេជជបណឌត គច មេងល" (in Khmer). Retrieved 2021-12-14.

I hope this helps. Willuconquer (talk) 10:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I tried in French, I can't find any. Oaktree b (talk) 13:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Using google translate on the links supplied by gave this and this. The former only mentions the education company as something founded, so that's passing and even though its in the Khmer article lede, perhaps this is not significant coverage. This latter one looks to be "Published Mengly J.Quach University Press", so arguably doesn't qualify. What would be WP:THREE? Chumpih. (talk) 21:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mengly Jandy Quach. It doesn't seem the nominated article is a fit for English Wikipedia. Missvain (talk) 17:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 01:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Missvain that a redirect to Mengly Jandy Quach seems to be the best option here. Quach is likely notable, but that doesn't mean that each of his charitable endeavors requires a separate article. In this case, this particular foundation doesn't seem to have received significant coverage from reliable sources. Redirecting to Quach's article, where the foundation is already mentioned, is a reasonable alternative to deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:23, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Missvain and ExtraordinaryWrit. Ingratis (talk) 01:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.