Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metaphysical fantasy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 09:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Metaphysical fantasy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This genre is a new genre, but seems also to be a non-notable term. The article itself cites no sources for discussion about this genre. Though Amazon has a tag on this genre, it seems not recognised and discussed anywhere. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personally (as the page's creator), I don't care either way. I just didn't think it belonged on the List of fantasy subgenres page. If you want an opinion from someone who cares, I recommend asking the person who created the material originally.

-- TimNelson (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In this light, I left a note on Talk:List_of_literary_genres#AfD_notification Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The term appears to be a neologism explained through original research. Them From Space 20:52, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.