Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Net cutter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Wiggles_oinks^waddles 19:21, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Net cutter

Net cutter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

• Unnecessary disambiguation page. Only links to a single article. Dab pages that differ between two meanings should be made into hatnotes, pages themselves should differ between at least three meanings with articles. This dab lists only one page with an article and is thus useless. -Geronimo20 (talk) 11:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• All 3 meanings are noteworthy. Ask any scuba diver about importance of (2) as a safety device. Ask a naval man about (3) in undersea warfare. {{hangon}}. This page was under construction when someone AfD'ed it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• Note Dab pages are not just to give definitions, they are supposed to link to articles. If for example the line about the scuba diver tool links to the relevant section in a scuba diver equipment article or an entirely fresh article about the tool, this could easily satisfy the requirements Geronimo sets and be kept at the same time. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:20, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• Keep - Now that Mgm's comment has been followed (i.e. 2, 3 and 4 go to either an article about it or part of an article with the pertinent information), it seems a legit search term. Also, with more than two items, hatnotes wouldn't suffice. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 14:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• Keep, after the change. Perhaps the nominator could withdraw the nom, since the article is now significantly different from the nominated versione. Since there is not much else to discuss, this afd could be then closed early. Tizio 15:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• Keep - This now disambiguates between multiple (3+) articles or article sections that could potentially have their own articles. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  16:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
• Keep after disambig. Themfromspace (talk) 17:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• Withdraw – now that these concerns have been addressed, I withdraw my nomination --Geronimo20 (talk) 18:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.