Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Tribal Revolution (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ishmael (novel). Scott Mac (Doc) 15:04, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Tribal Revolution[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Article Came Across as a OR from the start, i can't find any sources anywhere... Weaponbb7 (talk) 02:51, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Ishmael (novel), whose article is also too unsourced for my liking. this movement, while laudable (i may in fact be one of them), doesnt warrant an article if it cant find references other than the book and daniel quinns ideas. its essentially promotional. all the promotion this needs here is a link to daniel quinns website from the books by him, and his bio. this is similar to the problem of excess details of fictional worlds, where the only source is the work itself. what is this movements impact in the REAL world? if and when it becomes more notable, it can have its own article, but not now. oh, and for those who want this material here: if you are truly new tribalists, you wont be obsessed with trying to objectively define the movement in an encyclopedia (an invention of taker civilization, not a true expression of tribal culture. SNAP!)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect. I don't see the need for a separate article - the term is mentioned in few (but only a few) sources: [1]. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:03, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.