Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nivruttinath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jdcomix (talk) 14:21, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nivruttinath[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hindu saint. Unsourced since 2015 (WP:V), and written in a hagiographic / "in-universe" tone. A search indicates that this religious figure exists, but I am unable to determine his notability (WP:N) and whether enough sources for a separate article exist or whether a merge/redirect to a related topic would be appropriate. Sandstein 09:30, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:33, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 19:08, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cursory search shows plenty of book mentions that aren't used as references in the article. Perhaps the article is lacking attention rather than notability Cesdeva (talk) 21:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Meets WP:GNG. Notability not in question, very well-known saint, a lot more can be included in the article. The article can be improved with well written, broad coverage and better referencing. Marathi wikipedia [[1]] is having an article. -Ninney (talk) 22:40, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:10, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep No doubt in notability, lot of local language books also exist on the person, although not "very famous" I think he passes notability criteria without any problem Shrikanthv (talk) 09:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.