Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norland Wind

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Norland Wind[edit]

Norland Wind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG, and not enough prominence to satisfy WP:NSONGS. Basically, the song did not excite comment from the media. Binksternet (talk) 19:10, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- A record issued in a limited edition of 500 is unlikely to be notable: it probably means that the potential market was estimated at that level. Peterkingiron (talk) 10:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The song as a whole might be, though; it was one of the warhorses of the 80's folk revival. [[1]] This article, though, just looks like an ad. I lean toward delete. Anmccaff (talk) 18:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 03:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 09:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.