Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuking the Fridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:Orangemike. Zetawoof_(ζ) 02:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nuking the Fridge[edit]

Disputed prod. A very, very recent neologism (the film came out last week) without enough time to build widespread usage or any notability, let alone reliable sources; as well, in the final sentences, a suspicion of a commercial interest driving the asserted acceptance. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I found no reliable sources, so it appears to fail WP:N. Chuck (talk) 20:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete G4 Recreation of deleted material, was already deleted under the name "Nuke the fridge". Suggest a coat of salt. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 21:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt. Determined claque for this protologism. --Dhartung | Talk 23:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged as a repost. Zetawoof_(ζ) 23:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment endorsing speedy deletion Quite right, a repost of Afd'd material, and my apologies for not having noted that... I did look, but must have done something wrong. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Different title. The original article was Nuke the fridge; this one is Nuking the Fridge. Silly little details like that. Zetawoof_(ζ) 00:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.