Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osman Pamukoğlu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:27, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Osman Pamukoğlu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP that is very incorrectly sourced. Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Military, and Turkey. UtherSRG (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the Turkish article has many more sources - which I can't help much with presently, but may be able to come back to - so this may not be a lost cause. Also, Turkish newspapers will certainly have more to say about him, if anyone is up to the search. Ingratis (talk) 07:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' Examined the 8 references for the Turkish article. The de article and os article weren't referenced which for de certainly is an indication of poor quality. Some are press-releases, several of them are him talking, for example "TURKISH PEOPLE LIVING IN ANATOLIA AND THRACE, THIS CALL IS TO YOU!" and are WP:PRIMARY. and others are videos of him talking to the public, whch are WP:SPS sources. Others are proclamations. You can see his signature at the bottom of the documents. These are non-rs. None of them are WP:SECONDARY sources. It is all him doing his work. scope_creep^Talk 04:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.