Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outrepreneurs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 07:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Outrepreneurs[edit]
- Outrepreneurs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism. Contested PROD. Google search turns up nothing. —BradV 14:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Article is WP:NEO and possible WP:HOAX. Mh29255 (talk) 14:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete Non-notable, no sources of information and possible hoax.--EclipseSSD (talk) 15:43, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Probably not a hoax, just a punning neologism, likely in the service of selling the services of some consultant's advertising campaign. A non-notable neologism, original research, and an essay. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no sources. WillOakland (talk) 21:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Searching for "Patrick O'Shaughnessy" Outrepreneurs -wiki did not give any results.--Lenticel (talk) 23:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Completely non-notable neologism, if it even is one. [1] reveals practically nothing. — Wenli (reply here) 04:12, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.