Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearson in Practice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Pearson plc. Note that once content is merged, the page history must be kept in some form to preserve attribution rights. czar 02:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pearson in Practice[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not very notable, and rather promotional. Rathfelder (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree this is promotional and a large chunk of it is aWP:TNT case. Pearson plc is a notable company, but I don't think this grouping of companies once owned (apparently fairly briefly) by Pearson passes the bar of WP:NORG. SpinningSpark 23:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:03, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:11, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:11, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible merge to Pearson plc. As the group was sold and then largely closed down according to a Google news search, there is nothing left to promote. TSventon (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/Merge to Pearson plc.4meter4 (talk) 19:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Pearson plc, though may not be a simple copy and paste merge. Some prose likely will need to be cut out and this should be added as a former business(es) section/sub-section. We should also indicate it was a division, not a subsidiary. Doug Mehus (talk) 14:49, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above and then Delete this link. This topic was never notable and fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HighKing, Agree with that. Consider that essentially my vote above. The ensuing redirect would not be particularly helpful. Doug Mehus (talk) 15:42, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.