Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Hendrix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz Read! Talk! 05:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Hendrix[edit]

Rachel Hendrix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most roles are one-offs, nothing significant. No coverage in RS, most are cast lists. Not meeting ACTOR. Oaktree b (talk) 15:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, agreed that subject meets WP:NACTOR. —siroχo 03:45, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Enough coverage between Dothan Eagle and NiNe. magazine to meet GNG, and NACTOR also seems to be met with the first two films cited above being prominent roles. The third might not be as large of a role, hard to say, but it's moot given GNG coverage. - 2pou (talk) 16:44, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Based on the sources and roles, meets NACTOR and GNG. Naomijeans (talk) 02:52, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.