Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regius Professor of Anatomy (Aberdeen)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Regius Professor of Anatomy (Aberdeen)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the notability criteria of Wikipedia LT910001 (talk) 06:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. We generally keep articles on historic named chairs. Regius chairs are particularly notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We do indeed generally keep such articles for named chairs in major universities, and this particular one is not merely notable, but famous. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:57, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Since such chairs are normally included in the encyclopedia.LM2000 (talk) 02:11, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.