Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodney Fox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rodney Fox[edit]
- Rodney Fox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
NN individual - BLP1E is getting bit by a shark Hipocrite (talk) 22:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, more than one event. Designer of the first shark cage. One of the world's foremost authorities on the great white shark. Both of these now sourced in the article. A new name 2008 (talk) 02:00, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 04:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- KeepArticle needs improvement, but Fox is known for much more than the single shark-bite event. Murtoa (talk) 05:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable - although the article is a bit spammy as it stands, but that is a quality issue, it is capable of improvement. Orderinchaos 20:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. The man is clearly notable beyond one event. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- notable for more than one event. Even has a museum named for him in Glenelg, South Australia. -- Longhair\talk 21:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Diligent WP:BEFORE would have shown notability beyond one event. Article needs cleanup, but that's not a reason for AfD. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:24, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable expert of long standing. WWGB (talk) 12:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.