Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Burrows (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Burrows[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Is borderline (hence last AfD as no consensus, although it had minimal participation) but doesn't cross the threshold of significant coverage. Has been in CAT:NN for 11 years. Boleyn (talk) 13:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:16, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. The most likely route to notability is WP:NAUTHOR, I think. His book 3D Thinking in Design and Architecture: From Antiquity to the Future (ISBN 9780500519547) was named a "best tech book of 2018" by The Architect's Newspaper ([1]) and he was also interviewed about it on the radio ([2]), but I can't find much else, and I don't think one quasi-review and an interview is enough for NAUTHOR. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 01:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given previous AfD and longevity of article, not appropriate for SOFTDELETE.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.