Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Sharma (Rajasthan cricketer)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Rajasthan cricketers#R as a viable ATD Star Mississippi 10:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Rohit Sharma (Rajasthan cricketer)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rohit Sharma (Rajasthan cricketer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very short page and a violation of Wikipedia:BIO. BlakeIsHereStudios (talk) 13:23, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, India, and Rajasthan. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment it doesn't matter if it's short and how does it violate WP:BIO? Boleyn (talk) 14:39, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Vote change per WP:BIO. Rohit Sharma does not meet notability and biography is not enough to deserve attention or to be recorded. RangersRus (talk) 16:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Keep. The page is short but has reasonable coverage from reliable sources to warrant an article on the player. RangersRus (talk) 13:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete there are sources after his death, but they seem to just be WP:ROUTINE information about him and lists of teams he played for (and the 2 in this article are copies of each other too). Don't see enough WP:SIGCOV to pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep--176.88.141.249 (talk) 14:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- WP:NOTAVOTE, this has no policy-based reason for keeping. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Rajasthan cricketers#R Looks to fail WP:GNG, however there is a clear suitable redirect here per WP:ATD. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect Looks to fail WP:GNG. RoboCric Let's chat 04:36, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.