Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sankar (writer & director)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sankar (writer & director)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:AUTHOR. Not received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. The Doom Patrol (talk) 11:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Authors, Film, India, and Kerala. The Doom Patrol (talk) 11:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Previous AFD so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:11, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Not the best article title to assist in source searches as results are for other people, but adding the full name yielded nothing new except some unreliable user-editable sites. -2pou (talk) 16:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is this the same person [1]? Could perhaps be at AUTHOR with a few more reviews. Oaktree b (talk) 13:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not the same person. Author of that book has a career spanning seven decades according to the review, and this subject is only 42. Additionally, that book would need at least another review to be notable itself (entirely possible), but then another separate work of his would then need to have multiple reviews of their own in order to have a “body” of work to meet AUTHOR. -2pou (talk) 16:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We could use a few more concrete opinions here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on the explanation to my prior comment; I find nothing about this person. Oaktree b (talk) 13:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.