Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Hochstadt
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 16:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Steve Hochstadt[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Steve Hochstadt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ACADEMIC. Created by a WP:SPA back in 2008; seems to have slipped through the cracks of review. GuardianH (talk) 19:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Judaism, Illinois, and Maine. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:22, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:Author and possibly WP:Prof, Xxanthippe (talk) 00:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC).
- Keep. Meets WP:AUTHOR, see arguments above. --hroest 13:50, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:AUTHOR given the sources above and on the article --DannyS712 (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:AUTHOR as above. I added the reviews listed above to the article, along with several more. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:23, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep passes WP:AUTHOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.