Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upravleniye Otbrosami
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is that the band is notable, this album is not (yet, perhaps).--Kubigula (talk) 03:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Upravleniye Otbrosami[edit]
- Upravleniye Otbrosami (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Per WP:MUSIC, requires substantial coverage in reliable, third-party sources. None provided, none found. (One blog from September 2007 had the album coming out in November 2007, but they needed a label...) Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:52, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: band is not notable per WP:MUSIC. Mh29255 (talk) 14:26, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I think you misspoke. The band seems to be notable, this vaporous album does not. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:35, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability is not asserted in article, nor could any be found in a gsearch (both web and news). Once it's released it might become notable, but it's not there yet.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:N Artene50 (talk) 03:37, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP: This isn't just "some band", this is a band that has gone platinum with multiple albums.--Cooljuno411 (talk) 07:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - That's not the issue. The band is notable. Per WP:MUSIC this album is not. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It is an upcoming album, Michael Jackson has an article about an upcoming album, if you delete this article, feel free to delete his too because t.A.Tu. and MJ are both platinum awarded singers/groups.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooljuno411 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 4 June 2008
- Comment - First, WP:WAX is a bad argument. More to the point, this album is not notable because it is an upcoming album that is not the subject of substantial coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Michael Jackson's forthcoming studio album already went under my microscope. It is heavily sourced, citing the NY Daily News, E! News, Access Hollywood, Billboard, SOHH, MTV, New York Post, etc. This article, on the other hand, references the band's website and nothing else. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:44, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- It is an upcoming album, Michael Jackson has an article about an upcoming album, if you delete this article, feel free to delete his too because t.A.Tu. and MJ are both platinum awarded singers/groups.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooljuno411 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 4 June 2008
- Comment - That's not the issue. The band is notable. Per WP:MUSIC this album is not. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.