Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weixinism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weixinism[edit]
- Weixinism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recommend deletion due to lack of notability established through significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. A search for sources to support and establish notability came up empty. There are a few Chinese websites that mention the subject, but none met the threshold for independence and reliability. Cindy(talk to me) 16:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- N
ote: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 21:08, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I was unable to find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 21:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.