Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wild About Animals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wild About Animals[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a show with little notability, no sources, and a clear violation of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists --Z L Media 16:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --Z L Media 16:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

11:21, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tone 18:29, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The entire article is nothing but a three sentence stub that has remained undeveloped since its creation way-back in 2009. Not even the network it aired on or its original air date have been mentioned, for crying out loud! TheRedDomitor (talk) 13:38, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The article was truncated by its author shortly after I nominated it, as it had a list of the show's affiliates, albeit incomplete and unsourced. However, for this reasoning here, I still stand by my nomination. --Z L Media 23:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment: Not that listing a bunch of unsourced affiliates for the series around the US would have helped in establishing notability, but by truncating the article the author has only further diminished its value. All the more reason for deletion. TheRedDomitor (talk) 02:01, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per TheRedDomitor, there is nothing there in the article; bereft of notability of any kind. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.