Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 December 30

< December 29	December 31 >

December 30[edit]

Category:Toxic![edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 23:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Delete - eponymous overcategorization. The material on the single comic book title does not warrant the category. Otto4711 (talk) 20:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. –Pomte 13:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Top Grossing films[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 23:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: This category is not well defined, and lists of highest grossing films are ever changing.Alientraveller (talk) 20:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the category is too vague -- is it for a country, for the world, all-time, a year, a month, a holiday? There's no telling. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What is the cut off for "top grossing"? This is way too vague. ColdFusion650 (talk) 21:22, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. KellyAna (talk) 14:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vaguely named (and incorrectly capitalized) category. Doczilla (talk) 10:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete concur with nom. As film popularities decline over time, new films may move in, further, such a category lacks the useful information that a rank based list provides. simply noting it's on the list isn't worth the notation. Giving a film's rank on the list is contained int he film's article. ThuranX (talk) 03:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Toxic! titles[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 23:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Toxic! titles to Category:Apocalypse Ltd titles

Nominator's rationale: Rename. Toxic! is the name of the individual comic. Apocalypse Ltd is the comics company. In the alternative, if I'm misreading the publication history of the characters, then this should be renamed to Category:Apocalypse Ltd characters if they were not published as independent comics titles. Otto4711 (talk) 20:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Money Management Group artists[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete both. the wub "?!" 23:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Money Management Group was deleted at AfD, so I suppose the category is redundant. Spellcast (talk) 20:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Category:Money Management Group. Keep Category:Money Management Group artists. No reason to remove the artist category. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:19, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Buffalo Metro Rail stations[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 23:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Buffalo Metro Rail stations to Category:Buffalo, New York Metro Rail stations

Nominator's rationale: Rename. Match parent category naming. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Transportation in Buffalo[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 23:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Transportation in Buffalo to Category:Transportation in Buffalo, New York

Nominator's rationale: Rename. To match parent and precedents. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom. –Pomte 13:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dream Job seasons[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 23:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Following merger of two of the three articles the single remaining article does not warrant the eponymous category. Otto4711 (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Celtic Woman[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 23:10, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Delete - eponymous overcategorization for a music group. Per extensive precedent material doesn't warrant separate category. Otto4711 (talk) 18:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Star Wars devices[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was what Fayenatic said. the wub "?!" 23:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Only two in the category, upmerge to Star Wars items. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Upmerge Holocron to one parent i.e. Category:Star Wars items and side-merge it to Category:Fictional computers. The List of Star Wars weapons is already in other suitable categories including Category:Star Wars weapons, sub-cat of Category:Star Wars items. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People of the Qing Dynasty[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 23:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:People of the Qing Dynasty to Category:Qing Dynasty people

Nominator's rationale: Less awkward name, and also more consistent with the format of its subcategories. Nlu (talk) 17:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

rename I created this category, but now it should be renamed for consistency Hmains (talk) 00:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ferry Hall School[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Delete - unnecessary overcategorization for a single article and improper image gallery. The alumnae sub-category is small and non-defining of its membership and is better handled by the list in the main article. Otto4711 (talk) 17:32, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Listify alumnae in main article then delete both, transferring in school category inot main article (if not already there. Peterkingiron (talk) 00:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Buffy the Vampire Slayer monsters[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:55, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Delete - everything categorized here is already well-categorized within the extensive Category:Buffyverse structure. Two of the articles, Turok-Han and Vengeance demon, are demons which already have their own category Category:Buffyverse demons and another, Werewolf (Buffyverse) is not restricted to BtVS. Otto4711 (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jade Empire[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Delete. Category populated by only two entries which are already extensively linked to each other (the game and its characters page). A eponymous category is not necessary. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People from North Battleford[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was merge Category:People from North Battleford to Category:People from North Battleford, Saskatchewan. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: This category, Category:People from North Battleford is a duplicate from the other category, Category:People from North Battleford, Saskatchewan. This category People: from North Battleford, Saskatchewan has the most articles on this category, on the other category, People from North Battleford had only got the fewest articles. I will transfer the articles that has a category Category:People from North Battleford to it's new category home Category:People from North Battleford, Saskatchewan. Now here's what I'm going to tell you those two duplicate categories, Delete this category Category:People from North Battleford and Keep the category

Category:People from North Battleford, Saskatchewan cause the other category got the most articles and it's new category home. And once again, please make the category Category:People from North Battleford to be deleted. Thanks. Steam5 (talk) 10:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Category:People from North Battleford to Category:People from North Battleford, Saskatchewan for consistency with main article North Battleford, Saskatchewan. LeSnail (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as LeSnail. Peterkingiron (talk) 01:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per LeSnail. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional logos[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename Category:Fictional logos to Category:Images of fictional logos. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:04, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Fictional logos to Category:Images of fictional logos

Nominator's rationale: Rename. Clarify that this is a category for images of fictional logos, not articles about fictional logos. Doczilla (talk) 07:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional images[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was merge Category:Fictional images to Category:Images from fiction. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Upmerge into Category:Images from fiction. This category has no articles, just two subcategories. The subcategories are for images of fictional maps and fictional logos. While those things are indeed fictional, they are not fictional images. They are real images of fictional maps and logos. Doczilla (talk) 06:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:The Elder Scrolls maps[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename Category:The Elder Scrolls maps to Category:Images of Elder Scrolls maps. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:The Elder Scrolls maps to Category:Images of Elder Scrolls maps

Nominator's rationale: Rename to make it clear that everything in this category is an image. Doczilla (talk) 06:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional maps[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was rename Category:Fictional maps to Category:Images of fictional maps. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Propose renaming Category:Fictional maps to Category:Images of fictional maps

Nominator's rationale: Rename Category:Images of fictional maps to make it clear that everything in the category is an image. Doczilla (talk) 06:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rename per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Romulan ships[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was upmerge to both category:Romulans and category:Star Trek ship classes.--Mike Selinker (talk) 19:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: Only two articles in the category, delete and upmerge. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 05:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and upmerge underpopulated category. Doczilla (talk) 07:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but upmerge to both parent categories. - Fayenatic (talk) 09:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:It.wikipedia Featured Articles[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: This does not belong in the mainspace. If something's featured in the Italian language Wikipedia, it can go on the talk page as part of WikiProject Echo. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 02:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, created by a known vandal on the Italian Wikipedia.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 03:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The interwiki links indicate this, and we can find a complete list of FAs at the Italian Wikipedia. –Pomte 09:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom & not defining for the subject. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dream Job winners[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was merge Category:Dream Job winners to Category:Reality show winners. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest merging Category:Dream Job winners to Category:Reality show winners

Nominator's rationale: Merge - small category with no growth potential. The winners should be listed in the main article and the category merged. Otto4711 (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 02:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nomination. Doczilla (talk) 07:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.