Category:Giant Records (Warner Bros. subsidiary label) albums[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename both. — ξxplicit 04:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose - it is supposed to be for the project templates ("This user is a member of the Food & Drink WikiProject") while those cats are for the user templates ("This use likes food" or "This user likes to drink") --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 15:02, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Duplication of existing category and even if it was not, it is OCAT. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Listify. Since the list was created under the name suggested below, this becomes a Delete. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:34, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Rename to make it plural and expand the abbreviation. Darwinek (talk) 00:08, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I can live with either listifying or renaming per nom here. Since the category contains the list, a few of which are redlinks, I'm slightly more in favour of making an article out of it (or appending to the ASC's article, it's short enough), but failing that getting rid of the acronym is a good plan. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 04:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 10:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nominator if kept, but no objection to listification (whether as a new standalone list or as a list embedded in the head article). --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 11:32, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to expand abbreviation, but I too am unsure of its real merits. Convert list to an article List of Presidents of American Society of Cinematographers (or a section appended to main article), which might itself form the basis for a sub-category. I presume that being president is a significant distinction, where membership may not be. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:59, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 06:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge. this category is an one-year only orphan, and has not been continued since 2007 Hugo999 (talk) 01:06, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 05:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Admin comment: This is a technical relisting, for what it appears Hugo999 was trying to do with these edits. עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 05:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Awards and decorations of The Sri Lanka Police[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge. — ξxplicit 04:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. Upmerge category with single article to all parents. Tassedethe (talk) 12:36, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 05:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge per nom. Occuli (talk) 11:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge per nominator. This category appears to fit WP:OC#SMALL: "Avoid categories that, by their very definition, will never have more than a few members, unless such categories are part of a large overall accepted sub-categorization scheme". --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 12:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge. The acronym stands for public switched telephone network (I had to look that up), and is not used by any other category. Propose upmerging to the standard Telecommunications companies of Foo. Tassedethe (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 05:37, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete. Delete per my comments here. רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 04:01, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. To make things easier for editors who want to contribute to this discussion, please post a summary of your rationale here with the nomination. Editors should not have to go to another page in order to get any hint of the reason for the suggested deletion. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 11:41, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge certainly to Category:Levites as the first one is not otherwise in a Levites category (but is in several rabbis subcats). This seems to be OCAT via intersection of 2 unrelated properties. (I am not endorsing Category:Levites: that would be a separate cfd.) Occuli (talk) 11:45, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge per nominator. As the nominator pointed out elsewhere (see his link), there is no inherent connection between being a Cohen or Levi and being a rabbi. Debresser (talk) 13:28, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge per nominator. Being a Rabbi is a matter of study and ordination, being a Kohen or Levite is a matter of parentage. The two categories should remain separated. -- Avi (talk) 23:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge to Category:Levites per nom. All these people are already included in Category:Rabbis or one of its subcategories, so it doesn't make sense to me that they should be further classified as Kohen, Levi or Yisrael. This just seems to be an unnecessary classification. Yoninah (talk) 23:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Delete. Delete per my comments here. רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 03:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. To make things easier for editors who want to contribute to this discussion, please post a summary of your rationale here with the nomination. Editors should not have to go to another page in order to get any hint of the reason for the suggested deletion. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 11:42, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think that Rabbinic Kohanim is a useful sub-category of Kohanim or People of Kohanim descent, because that status gives them both limitations (such as the prohibition against going into cemeteries or doing funerals) or rights (such as "duchening": delivering the Birkat Kohanim/Aaronide blessing) which has an impact on their roles as rabbis. Plus, one of the roles of the ancient Kohanim, according to the Bible, was to teach the differences between the "pure" and the "impure" (and by extension, between right and wrong), part of the role of the modern rabbi, so it is an interesting sub-category, to see which kohanim are continuing the ancient roles. Some rabbis have had increased followings because of their identities as kohanim. Finally, there is a category of Rabbinic Levi'im, a sub-category of Levi'im, so it would make sense to have Rabbinic Kohanim as a sub-category of Kohanim. Floridarabbi (talk) 12:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge per nominator. As the nominator pointed out elsewhere (see his link), there is no inherent connection between being a Cohen or Levi and being a rabbi. Debresser (talk) 13:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge per nominator. Being a Rabbi is a matter of study and ordination, being a Kohen or Levite is a matter of parentage. The two categories should remain separated. -- Avi (talk) 23:58, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge to Category:Kohanim per nom. All these people are already included in Category:Rabbis or one of its subcategories, so it doesn't make sense to me that they should be further classified as Kohen, Levi or Yisrael. This just seems to be an unnecessary classification. Yoninah (talk) 23:19, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
