The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Delete. Violates WP:USERCAT as the category does not aid in facilitating coordination and collaboration between users for the improvement and development of Wikipedia. — ξxplicit 22:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- The objective is achieved by placing articles in ones watchlist. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per vast precedent of deleting individual-user categories. VegaDark (talk) 02:41, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Merge. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:26, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Merge. Too small a category to be a sub of LGBT historians, which only has this cat in it. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 19:48, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support LGBT is the usual classification. The precise division is not useful. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:31, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
