The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename. Jafeluv (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Keep. Jafeluv (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes indeed, Keep as part of an established structure, per WP:SMALLCAT. (And given what I imagine is the difficulty is simply being a blogger in Cuba, all the more interesting...) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:02, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Religion articles without a WikiProject[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 16:15, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Delete. unnecessary. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:16, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What purpose could this serve? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete. עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 13:12, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No parent scheme Category:Speakers or any clear inclusion criteria--all kinds of persons speak in public. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as both WP:OC and confusing - it makes it sound like "Bisexual" is a language. - The BushrangerOne ping only 10:03, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:College football teams in the National Football League Draft[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename. Jafeluv (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Rename. College football teams do not enter the NFL Draft; individual players do. Also add "Lists of...". Jweiss11 (talk) 05:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Shouldn't it be draftees with a lower case 'd' a la NBA high school draftees? I don't think a capitalized D is correct. Jrcla2 (talk) 16:34, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In this case "Draftee" is a modification of National Football League Draft, so I think it carries the capitalization as a proper noun. The way the NBA category is phrased, "draftees" is clearly improper. I'm not beholden either way here as I can see a reasonable interpretation of "National Football League Draftees" with an improper "draftees". Jweiss11 (talk) 03:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I figured that was the rationale for "Draftees", but I just think it looks weird. Even if it is supposed to be an extension of National Football League Draft, it looks like it would make more sense to have it "National Football League draftees" since the new expression (draftees) is now conveying the group of players chosen in an NFL Draft, whereas the old expression (Draft) denotes the draft itself. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I agree with Jrcla that "draftees" should not be capitalised. Jenks24 (talk) 04:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tweak nomination. After some more thought, I agree with with Jrcla2. The capitalized "Draftees" does look weird and probably isn't correct from a technical grammar stand-point. Jweiss11 (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wikipedians with lounges as user pages[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete. עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 13:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - does not contribute to assisting work on the encyclopedia; gag category. - The BushrangerOne ping only 09:59, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/speedy delete - Does not support collaboration. VegaDark (talk) 08:22, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
