The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:28, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Delete. Eponymous category containg only 1 article, Dadiani Palaces Museum and cannot see any likely articles to further populate it. Tim! (talk) 23:45, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Category unlikely to be populated further. jonkerz♠ 02:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:29, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Expanding this initialism will make it easier to understand and make it match the main article. jonkerz♠ 01:43, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to remove ambiguityCurb Chain (talk) 07:43, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Rename (though I'm very much open to better suggestions). "Macintosh" is the proper name and using "Mac" is too we-love-Apple-ish. I would also support deletion as even the existence of the category could be perceived as caving in to the Apple cult. (Cult of which I'm a proud member but still...) Pichpich (talk) 01:23, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question. So, what is this category for? The definition says "The signatures of the members of this category are engraved on the inside of the original Macintosh computer". So are they the designers of the computer, or what? If so, I would think just an upmerge to Category:Apple Inc. employees would be appropriate. Good Ol’factory(talk) 08:00, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom or upmerge per Good Ol’factory. Is it defining for eg Daniel Kottke? Possibly. Occuli (talk) 10:39, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
