The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete once the member images are ported to Wikimedia Commons. These are all public domain or GFDL and don't belong on Wikipedia, but rather on Commons. CaseyPenk (talk) 06:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: No foreseeable use for cat or text. Chris857 (talk) 14:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I removed the user talk page. Page was created by a newbie editor unfamiliar with WP. ...sigh... -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:47, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. We were all newbies once. :) CaseyPenk (talk) 06:39, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom, although I'm cracking up at the singling out of Hitman: Absolution (a game which has yet to be released). CaseyPenk (talk) 05:58, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wholly subjective. SuperMarioMan 21:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly biased as the cat does not include MOO3. For shame, people! Benkenobi18 (talk) 08:32, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Well, I have created one more article. The category has many articles on the Chinese Wikipedia, so I think it has potential for growth.--MakecatTalk 02:42, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I created a couple more articles based on the Chinese Wikipedia. Please do forgive my poor Chinese skills. I know there is a need for these articles, so any contributions to the member articles would be appreciated. CaseyPenk (talk) 06:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: It was renamed after Suzhou Rail Transit officially, and no pages was left in the category. MakecatTalk 02:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Suzhou Rail Transit, to clear up any confusion browsers may have. CaseyPenk (talk) 06:27, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Rename. The predominant spelling of the word in these countries is "labour". Good Ol’factory(talk) 00:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment. There are a bunch more of these on Wikipedia, some of which I have added to the category, but I imagine these should just be merged to Category:Flag images. I'm not sure what the perceived advantage of subcategorizing by file type might be, unless this is some sort of flip-side tracking device to accompany Category:Flag images that should be in SVG format. Good Ol’factory(talk) 02:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a useful sorting mechanism until Category:Flag images that should be in SVG format is deprecated. Separating between SVG and non-SVG helps image creators direct their attention to the appropriate areas. Once all flags are in SVG format, we can upmerge both categories. But as it is, Category:Flag images is diffused into useful subcategories. If we decide to upmerge Category:SVG flags, then we must logically upmerge Category:Flag images that should be in SVG format (which is not a step that would help editors). So, I suggest we keep the diffusion structure as a motivational tool and sorting mechanism. CaseyPenk (talk) 06:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I diffused the handful of member flags of Category:Flag images into the appropriate sub-category. Now the sub-categorization scheme is at least implemented consistently. CaseyPenk (talk) 06:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge per Olfactory's convincing argument (see discussion directly above this one). The default should be SVG, and any non-compliant PNGs or JPGs should be labelled as such and subject to "ostracization" if you will. CaseyPenk (talk) 08:18, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
