The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:42, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Procedural close/recommendation This is the only subcat. of Category:Country albums CfD'ed--why? And for that matter, why not that category? I'm altogether indifferent to the naming, but at the very least, nominate them all in one fell swoop or at least from the top down. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:42, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Response I am a big fan of consistency, so I am inclined to say weak rename per country music. On the other hand, it is mildly silly to call something a "country music album" because if you say "county album" you clearly mean "a music album composed of country music." I'll err on the side of consistency over being silly though. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:44, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. It might be precise to the Nth degree, but no harm in that. --Richhoncho (talk) 21:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Songs written by Sandra Sully (songwriter)[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: She wrote about 4 songs, pointless article. She fails notability guidelines. Aaron • You Da One 17:22, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The nomination mentions "article" yet the nomination is against a category. So I'll respond regarding the article, WP:COMPOSER says, "Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition." Well with 2 entries in the category I think the criteria is met. In respect of the category, with two entries and "part of tree," it too should survive this nomination. Thanks for the note on my talkpage.--Richhoncho (talk) 17:29, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, it's a pointless category then. Simply not enough information. Aaron • You Da One 17:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - fits the overall category scheme. Enough members. What's the problem? Benkenobi18 (talk) 03:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a perfect example of WP:SMALLCAT. How many articles does the nom suppose it needs to have before being useful? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Brutalist architecture in West Virginia[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support for the reasons provided. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete as an unused category. No prejudice against recreation if it can be populated (even if only with one article, per the WP:SMALLCAT exemption for an established tree) The BushrangerOne ping only 21:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Empty and unneeded category. Kumioko (talk) 11:34, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 19:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:United Methodist bishops in the United States[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Redundant to Category:United Methodist bishops by jurisdiction. All UMC bishops in the USA are already divided into the regions ("jurisdictions") in which they serve, and thus all of the subcategories of this category are also present in the "by jurisdiction" category. Nyttend (talk) 02:38, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – the "by jurisdiction" category also includes a 4th jurisdiction (Central) which is not entirely in the US. If not kept, this should be upmerged to the other parent, Category:Bishops in the United States. Oculi (talk) 12:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Do we really need a second layer of categorisation? Remember that categories are here to serve the reader, and when we have two categories with such huge overlap, it's confusing rather than helpful. Nyttend (talk) 20:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like this is another pastorwayne creation. Probably should just remove the whole tree. - jc37 23:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
