The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment - You could be opening a can of worms there Alan, seeing as Lahore lies in Pakistan, not India, even though historically it belongs to India as well. There were two major shrines that were definitely missing from that category (Data Durbar Complex and the Samadhi of Ranjit Singh). I would suggest that instead the Lahore category could be merged with Category:Sufi shrines in Pakistan to form a Category:Shrines in Pakistan, thereby avoiding international disputes. That said I see no reason that this category could not be recreated when there are articles on some of the other shrines in Lahore. Green Giant (talk) 00:29, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oops... A moment of geographical ignorance. Thanks for that.-- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:55, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose has potential for growth plus within an established sub-categorization scheme. I'd prefer to keep it. gidonb (talk) 07:20, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, this is the correct name! gidonb (talk) 20:43, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per Fayenatic. Seems we can have a well-populated category over time, even without (the Muslim equivalent of) parishcruft. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:45, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename per C2C. Discussion on whether or not "shrines" is approprirate can be done in a new nomination. The BushrangerOne ping only 23:07, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: per convention. I am not sure if "shrine" is the correct word for the contents. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:13, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per convention. gidonb (talk) 07:21, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lynn University Fighting Knights golfers[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:deleted as empty. In the future, when a category is emptied as a result of a logical, noncontroversial split such as this, you can simply tag it for speedy deletion under criterion WP:C1. The BushrangerOne ping only 23:08, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete.--Mike Selinker (talk) 21:56, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Too early for this category. Please move the text to the article space. gidonb (talk) 07:29, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unfortunatly categories cannot be moved to articlespace; this will need to be recreated from scratch. - The BushrangerOne ping only 23:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The text can be cut and pasted into a new article. Closing person: If this proposal is adopted, please mention the author of the text while doing so! gidonb (talk) 20:47, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is largely an article masquerading as a category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:20, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete under the assumption Obi2canibe is correct about the categorization.--Mike Selinker (talk) 21:55, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. Category redirect will be established. The BushrangerOne ping only 21:25, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Rename to more accurately describe the category's contents. The current title and the category's explanatory text ("enduring communities") sound like a caricature of corporate communications. BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 16:49, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Could probably be speedied. Seems uncontroversial to me. Benkenobi18 (talk) 17:41, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Recipients of the Resistance Memorial Cross (The Netherlands)[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Since they are by the same user, on the same day, under the same parent category, and equally deviate from our standards, I have added the other categories to this CFD. gidonb (talk) 03:24, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rename all (changing my !vote). Sorry! I looked at this again, and it seems that I somehow missed the fact that the proposal is to remove the definite article from the disambiguator; I had somehow misread it as removing the definite article from the substantive title. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 12:44, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support for the sake of clarity and consistency. gidonb (talk) 13:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Video games based on films directed by the Wachowski brothers[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename per C2D. (The Wachowskis). Capital "T" in "The" used as "The" is part of the pairing's actual name. The BushrangerOne ping only 23:12, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Rename. They now go by "The Wachowskis" instead of "The Wachowski Brothers. Trivialist (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support. per noms rationale. I created a couple of the articles that are in this category and have worked on a lot of the others. The category should be "Seven Enemy Offensives" as a proper noun. It is the most common rendering in WP:RS. Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:33, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Withdrawn On second thought, there is something to be said for consistency with the encyclopedic content, but it doesn't outweigh that the Palestinians would probably prefer to call their country Palestine instead of Palestinian territories. Unlike the encyclopedic content, there's no need to free up a name for the region. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 06:07, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
