The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:01, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Thai government ministries are known as such. Departments are subordinate to the ministries, and the term may cause confusion. Compare with the other country categories. Paul_012 (talk) 04:07, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Rename per nom: they are all called ministries, except the Office of the Prime Minister. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:53, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale There is only 1 article anywhere under Category:993 establishments. I do not think it is justified to subdivide that category at all. It is also the only article we current have for an establishment in the 990s in Bohemia, so there is no point in merging it there.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. I'm going to add 973 to the nomination since that is the only other year in the century that exists. At this time there is no need for by decade categories. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think merging to 10th century is probably the best way forward with splitting to the decade level if a lot more articles are added. Tim! (talk) 07:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Subdivision can be done when more (enough) articles are found. --Dirk BeetstraTC 09:09, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Members of provincial executive councils[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Rename. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:03, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Rename. We need to specific what country this category deals with since there are other countries that have had or have "provincial executive councils". The proposed name format would match a related category: Category:Members of New Zealand provincial councils. Good Ol’factory(talk) 00:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support from the creator of the category. Can you please ensure that the explanatory text will be transferred to the new page? Schwede66 21:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I will double check if the category is renamed. If done by a bot, it certainly will be copied. Good Ol’factory(talk) 21:51, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
