Category:Real Atlético Garcilaso footballers[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Proposed renaming reflects article title (Real Garcilaso) which is the common name for the football club. Hack (talk) 12:57, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Amateur radio organizations in India[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge; will keep a redirect. Good Ol’factory(talk) 00:21, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. The rest of the Czech tree is with a 'z'. However, Tim! should please explain why he created this duplicate category in the first place?? --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge; will keep a redirect. Good Ol’factory(talk) 00:20, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok to merge - Per nom. It's ok for me, to harmonize categorization forms. Btw I've created other categories also about organi(z/s)ations based in. Sometimes is not simple to choose the better form but, for an harmonization, feel free to merge eventual others. Greets. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:51, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reverse merge. UK English predominates in Europe, so we should use the UKanian spelling. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 13:40, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Modern artillery of the United Kingdom[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename/delete as nominated. Good Ol’factory(talk) 00:16, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The use of "modern" (sometimes meaning 19thC-, sometimes 1945-) in category names goes even wider than that - see Category:Modern military equipment. It's too complex to cover in one huge CFD. There are other CFDs about different parts of the "modern" tree (e.g. this) and assuming these CFDs go through OK they may be followed by larger CFDs. DexDor (talk) 05:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- We deleted a host of "modern" categories as a case of a current/past distinction which we do not allow for categories. Personally I do not like the Cold War/Post Cold war split. However if we are going to have it, we should use "Post Cold War", not modern. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:36, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Royal Norwegian Navy guided missiles[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: That a missile (or anything else for that matter) has been operated (i.e. used) by a particular organization is not a WP:DEFINING characteristic of that missile. These 2 categories contain a single article and that article is in other more appropriate categories (e.g. Category:Anti-ship cruise missiles of Norway).
Comment -- I doubt Norway makes its own weapons, in which case this is a performance by performer category and should be deleted. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, Norway has developed the Naval Strike Missile, but the RNoN is an operator of the weapon (many weapons have many operators), not its developer (which is more defining). DexDor (talk) 21:53, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
