Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 November 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 5[edit]

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Doglicker9912[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7 (creator requests deletion).
(For future reference of DarthBotto and other editors, there is no need to open a CFD discussion in this sort of sitruation. Just tag the page with {{tl|db-self}. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:14, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator's rationale: I admittedly botched the creation of this category, as there was already one that was relevant to this sock. Please delete this as soon as possible, with no objections from yours truly. DarthBotto talkcont 23:32, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tagged G7 - this can be speedily deleted per author's request. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 02:23, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:UK locations with ethnic minority-majority populations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:04, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Having an "ethnic minority-majority population" is not a permanent WP:DEFINING characteristic of a town or district. For info: The inclusion criteria for this category are rather complex. If this information is needed in WP then it's better handled as a list (with dates and references) than as a category. For info: there is already List of English districts and their ethnic composition and Lists of UK locations with large ethnic minority populations. An example of a previous similar CFD is Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_March_20#Populated_places_in_the_United_States_with_African_American_majority_populations. DexDor (talk) 20:02, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator. Like other demographic factors, the ethnic mix of an area fluctuates, and can change radically in the space of only a few decades. So it is not a permanent defining characteristic. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:06, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Beyond the problem that this is a changeable characteristic of the place, who is an "ethnic minority" is a tricky thing to define. Are Roma ethnic minority? Jewish immigrants from Poland? Polish immigrants? Immigrants from Turkey? Immigrants from Greece? If not the last, why not? Hispanics? If so, are immigrants from Spain ethnic minority people?John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:14, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, after checking that the list Lists of UK locations with large ethnic minority populations is adequate, per African-American precedent. "ethnic minority" is a term well understood in UK, and will cover a multitude of post-WWII immigrant communities, but I do not think this is a good basis for a category. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)----[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedia general sanctions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The new name describes the content of the category better, as it doesn't contain project pages. Armbrust The Homunculus 16:13, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Oil painters[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 20:12, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Just set up. If it was complete it would contain maybe 15,000 members. As it is the creator has added about 65 and moved on to other stuff. The vast majority of the parent Category:Painters should go in, and as the default for Western painting artists since about 1500 it isn't really defining or useful. If kept it should be renamed Category:Painters in oils, the idiomatic term. Johnbod (talk) 13:11, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'm fine with the far smaller & more specialized Category:Watercolorists (most of whom of course used oil at least sometimes), and the other by medium cats we have. I would not want to see a fresco painter category, nor pastellists etc. Nor should sculptors (unlike sculptures) be divided into bronze, stone etc. Johnbod (talk) 03:10, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Pastel artists also exists. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 04:14, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Another nomination to do then - none of the famous ones are there of course. Johnbod (talk) 04:34, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- If we have by medium categories, there is not reason not to have this one. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reasons have been given above. Johnbod (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shubdubs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete as there is no article on the band or rename to Category:Shubdubs members based on the contents of the category. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 05:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust The Homunculus 09:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:National Basketball Association players from Latin America[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category forms an unnecessary layer of categorization. There is no organizational improvement brought about by splitting Category:National Basketball Association players by cultural or geographic region, in addition to national origin. All of the affected national categories can be found in corresponding categories of Fooian basketball players, Expatriate basketball people in the United States, and Fooian expatriates in the United States, and there are no categories of Latin American basketball players or Latin American expatriates in the United States. -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:52, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.