The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: These are competitions and part of the Category:Sports competitions structure. "Championships" is not an easily definable attribute. SFB 17:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support as other such categories. NickSt (talk) 18:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. – FayenaticLondon 11:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Rename. This category represent an inappropriate implementation of the guideline WP:ENDASH. One example that is given is that of singer-songwriter: "Wrong: a singer–songwriter; not separate persons, so use a hyphen: a singer-songwriter". Like singer-songwriters, each cleric-scientist is one person, and so it should be hyphenated, not endashed, just like Category:Singer-songwriters. Good Ol’factory(talk) 04:12, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ugh I dislike these "one job-another job" formulations, but it has a list, and sources. Can I still not like it? I'm just going to register that. the same for actor-politicians and other hyphenated annoyances. Why can't we just use category intersection to find "Footballer/philosophers" and "Rabbi/biologists" and "Actor/directors" and so on and so forth. Must we really create these two-job-intersection categories? ah, yes, I know, reliable sources, blah blah.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Obi-Wan Kenobi, what do you mean by 'category intersection'? It's a feature of Wikipedia that I don't know yet. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:45, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that in general these categories are weird, if nothing else, and quite liable to hatred. Good Ol’factory(talk) 05:32, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In that case just plain delete. We don't need this hybrid category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
delete, there isn't enough valid content to warrant an eponymous category.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 16:20, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
