Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 October 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 28[edit]

Category:Anime articles needing expert attention[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:58, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category:Anime and manga articles needing expert attention already exists. 20:04, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:2010 pornographic films[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete; upmerge contents to Category:2010s pornographic films. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:06, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary diffusion by year Fortdj33 (talk) 19:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Medieval England articles by quality[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: wrong place Duonaut  (talk | contribs) 02:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I was gonna create this article for assessment, But I changed my mind cause it would be too hard. Duonaut  (talk | contribs) 02:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.