The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:no consensus, and so outdated that no further participation or consensus is likely to emerge at this point. No prejudice against relisting for a new discussion if desired. Bearcat (talk) 22:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Being more inclusive is better then creating more categories. --76.175.67.121 (talk) 18:00, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Question of the 25 articles in that category, how many fit into each, or how many interpreters will you add? (I'm wondering if there are enough articles for two categories.) 22:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Oppose as two very different topics that should not be combined. See our articles on linguists and interpreters. Instead split as needed. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
