Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 September 3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 2 September 4 >

September 3[edit]

Category:SKCF Sevastopol[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unneeded category. Only one entry, main article, SKCF Sevastopol. NickSt (talk) 13:43, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As a defunct third division club from a defunct country, I don't see content expanding beyond the main article. SFB 18:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Awards for film actors[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Film acting awards. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:25, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is the same category as Category:Film acting awards Gonnym (talk) 11:57, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge to parent scope is clearly the same. SFB 18:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and redirect as liable to be re-created, since the contents partly match this name. – Fayenatic London 20:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in England[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:27, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Also all subcategories named this way

In keeping with the corresponding articles; see List of Scheduled Monuments, etc. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:04, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support -- I think this is the current nomenclature. A followup nom will be needed for all the subcats. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:59, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It makes sense to standardise the cats with the lists however care is need as both of the terms Ancient monument and Scheduled monument are currently in use.— Rod talk 16:48, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fauna of Ceuta[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Upmerge. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: That, for example, European rabbit is found in Ceuta/Melilla is not a WP:DEFINING characteristic of that species. DexDor (talk) 06:17, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Fauna are better categorised by region as they do not recognise human borders. SFB 00:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fauna of Jersey[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:28, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: That, for example, Hazel dormouse is found in Jersey/Guernsey is not a WP:DEFINING characteristic of that species. DexDor (talk) 06:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Fauna are better categorised by region as they do not recognise human borders. SFB 00:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fauna of Akrotiri and Dhekelia[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:29, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: That, for example, Nathusius's pipistrelle is found in Akrotiri and Dhekelia is not a WP:DEFINING characteristic of that species. DexDor (talk) 06:11, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Fauna are better categorised by region as they do not recognise human borders. SFB 00:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Unincorporated communities in DeKalb County, Georgia (U.S. state)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep as a redirect. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Tagged as "administrative category", but as an empty category, this serves no purpose, and is not needed for administration (unlike maintenance categories which are sometimes empty) Fram (talk) 04:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note that we already have the populated category Category:Unincorporated communities in DeKalb County, Georgia, so the above seems to be an unwanted duplicate category. Fram (talk) 06:25, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this is a redirect category. Several items were added to it that belong in Category:Unincorporated communities in DeKalb County, Georgia, and have been moved there manually (by me). Any new additions will now be automatically migrated. Reflexive disambiguation of Georgia to Georgia (U.S. state) is not uncommon. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 11:45, 3 September 2014 (UTC).
Note that this wasn't a redirect category at the time of this nomination, it has been turned into one since. Fram (talk) 12:07, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As stated above me.Bobherry talk 23:24, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a redirect because there is no DeKalb county in the Caucasus, so that the disambiguator is redundant. However, this must not be a precedent for removing a disambiguator from any potentially ambiguous categories. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Harassment incidents in video games[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:20, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Aside from the fact that there are only three articles included, I am not sure if it is appropriate to have BLPs in such a category and I would question whether the incidents are each notable enough to warrant independent articles. Given that categorization policy requires this to be a defining characteristic of the subject in reliable sources, rather than just something that has happened to them, I also doubt it will be populated significantly. The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 01:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I expected this category to be more populated, but then I noticed that the other harassment incidents in the tech world were not related to gaming but to other professionals. The category is not intended to apply to the biographies but to the incidents reported in the articles; to make that clearer, it could be changed to a list and expanded to cover all incidents in tech. Diego (talk) 08:19, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not counting the source article, there's just two names in there, not enough to show a compelling amount of cases specifically regarding videogames; plus, this is related to the current GamerGate controversy. A topic like this should be, frankly, about historical events, not just contemporary ones. If the only examples we have is two cases from last week and not (for example), an issue from the 70s, 80s or such, then it's not category-worthy yet. Someday, perhaps. But not yet. --ip.address.conflict (talk) 18:15, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Those two people are not "incidents" and should be removed. This category doesn't feasibly contain enough content beyond the main article at the moment. SFB 00:03, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_September_3&oldid=1146512829"