The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
rename to match parent article.--Lenticel(talk) 03:40, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:merge as amended. Good Ol’factory(talk) 01:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Merge. This does not seem to be a useful category as it only contains one article, The Singing Stones of Brittany, which is more an attraction than an environmental article. If editors think it should still be categories in environment, then upmerge to Category:Environment of France as well. – FayenaticLondon 20:54, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, thanks – that's a better target. I have added the page into the category that I suggested before. – FayenaticLondon 17:32, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename to "Christianity and law in the xxth century".Good Ol’factory(talk) 23:48, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Rename. The preposition "in" in the category name is not in line with the actual content of the categories: they're not about Christian laws but are instead about state law regarding Christianity. If a proposition must be kept in the category name, it should be changed into "about" or "regarding". The proposed category names are the most neutral form, without a preposition. Optionally, "law" may be changed into "state law". Marcocapelle (talk) 19:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment—The proposed category names don't feel quite right, as to me they suggest that they're about temporal sub-types of Christianity in conjunction with law. I wonder if Christianity and law in the xxth century would express the concept a little better. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You're quite right. Support alternative per Beeswaxcandle. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:40, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Natural history of the Caribbean by islands[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:Merge. There is no need for a separate category. Sort keys beginning with a space would be sufficient to separate the categories by topic from the categories by island. – FayenaticLondon 19:08, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Makes sense to me. Merge. Guettarda (talk) 19:19, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Apart from inconsistency, the trouble with the current name is that many or all the sub-cats are actually not for single islands but groups of islands. – FayenaticLondon 17:00, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: delete per WP:SMALLCAT. The one article in this category has been sufficiently categorized, so no need to upmerge. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. MER-C 08:17, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:United Arab Emirates Wikipedia administration[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: This category contains 4 subcats - for portals, stubs, templates and wikiprojects. It thus places many pages that are not administration pages below Category:Wikipedia administration. It also causes circular categorization as Category:WikiProject United Arab Emirates is both a parent and a grandchild of this category. The subcats are all in more suitable parent categories. There is Category:United Arab Emirates articles by quality (which categorizes talk pages) and is the normal (and much more comprehensive) way to group pages of interest to a particular group of editors. Note: This category is one of 8 "<country> Wikipedia administration" categories, but there is no such category for the other 200+ countries (e.g. there is no "France Wikipedia administration" category). Related previous discussion: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_January_8#Category:Mauritius_Wikipedia_administration. DexDor (talk) 07:12, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support needlessly circular arrangement. A WikiProject is the centre of administration for a topic. SFB 22:01, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
