Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 February 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< February 5 February 7 >

February 6[edit]

Category:Magic: The Gathering blocks[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Merge. For those who don't know, Magic: The Gathering has "sets", and these sets are sometimes organized into "blocks" of 2-4 related sets (usually 3). Currently the category scheme distinguishes like so:

But "part of a block" is a tiny and unimportant distinction, both to people unfamiliar with Magic as well as veteran players. They're all Magic sets. It is perfectly accurate to categorize Theros in an MTG sets category, where it will simply be a list of sets, just like the core set list example above. It's far more useful to simply combine all set articles together. SnowFire (talk) 22:53, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ukrainian politicians convicted of embezzlement‎[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge as proposed. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: because of WP:SMALLCAT, only 2 articles, and also because there is no other country child category within Category:Politicians convicted of embezzlement‎. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:59, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Women's studies stubs[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete and upmerge contents as proposed. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Only 46 articles in Category:Gender studies stubs as a whole. No need for a split. Propose double-upmerging template {{womens-studies-stub}} to Category:Gender studies stubs and Category:Feminism stubs and deleting the category. Dawynn (talk) 13:22, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:"Part of a series on" templates[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:10, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Looks like this category is meant for sidebar templates (Category:Sidebar templates is one of its parents) so, in case that's not realized and/or other templates include "Part of a series on", suggest rename. Squiver (talk) 12:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support helps specifies what form these templates usually take and prevents needless duplication under both categories. SFB 19:44, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Other Russia (coalition)[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale; per The Other Russia (coalition). Charles Essie (talk) 00:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_February_6&oldid=1074814676"