The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. MER-C 12:44, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support As it stands, it sounds like an ethnic definer (e.g. African-American) which is not the purpose of the cat. It's actually a geographic cat. Laurel Lodged (talk) 09:35, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Better consistency; some are technically parasitoids; being more inclusive is better then creating more categories; could serve as "root category" for all non-existing infectious agents (such as a virus, bacterium, prion, fungus, viroid, or parasite) that causes disease in its host. --76.175.67.121 (talk) 19:48, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- WP's fictional categories should mirror those of real life. I am not sure how to apply that here. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:01, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SupportCategory:Fictional diseases and disorders per parent category; some of these are chemical or genetically related. SupportCategory:Fictional parasites and parasitoids per parent category; Aliens are parasitoids, not parasites. --Inyouchuu shoku (talk) 05:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - including pathogens helps to support the whole relevance of these fictional articles.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- We have a recent(but now well established) policy of not categorizing universities according to the association or group of which they are a member. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:58, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:WikiProject Tenacious D participants[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. MER-C 11:43, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
