The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Upmerge all. עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 13:47, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:Merge. Once all of the articles in this tree are reviewed to see which ones are better suited to the buildings and structures tree we are left with only one article and 10 categories for 10 other articles (decade summary articles). So this really adds very little if anything to help navigation. Up merging will improve navigation. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:18, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge -- annual and even decennial categories at remote periods will never be adequatelyn populated. They are likely to get in the way of navigation, rather than aiding it. Some major structures at that period took many years to complete, so that a broad category with a dozen or two articles is much better than a tree made up of wisps, with a series of cats leading to a single article. I expect that this needs to be followed up by dealing with other early cneturies. Peterkingiron (talk) 09:40, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, all of the related categories are being reviewed. It is likely to take another month or two before everything is reviewed. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:09, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:rename. – FayenaticLondon 07:40, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per rest of structure and fact that non-journalists (e.g. proprietors) are a useful inclusion that warrants the broader name. @Geschichte: Wouldn't the parent be better as Category:People by newspaper in Norway? SFB 19:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:keep. Dawynn's suggested deletions would need a fresh nomination. – FayenaticLondon 15:40, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the stub template does not exist, the subcategory already lies in the musician-stub category tree. Upmerge the SKmusician-stub category into SK-stub category. Per Category:Music stubs, there can be country-based music stubs, so if this exists, it should keep its current name, as it is more general than just biographies. It should be parented to Category:Music stubs as the country-stub-category for SK music. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All of this should create a nearly full category. (For the purposes of WP:WSS, that's a minimum of 60 articles) Dawynn (talk) 13:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to category:SouthKorea-music-related-stub and merge into it all the subcategories related to music and musicians. As far as I can see the whole tree only contains 50-60 articles, which is enough for a stub category, but not enough to split. Peterkingiron (talk) 09:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It seems to me (as an other WSS member) that Dawynn's proposal makes more sense than deleting this category. עוד מישהוOd Mishehu 13:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the sub-categories have not yet been tagged, so this should probably be relisted. @Dawynn: should their other parent stub categories, Category:Korean musical group stubs and Category:Korean singer stubs, also be upmerged? The former has only the sub-cat plus a Korean-American band (Uptown 3000). The latter has c.30 pages which are mostly South Korean as well (with a few from the Korean diaspora, Akiko Wada & June (singer)); as that makes over 50 South Korean singer stubs, is that worth keeping after all? Also, should there be a Category:Korean music stubs to aid navigation? – FayenaticLondon 07:37, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
