Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 October 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 5[edit]

Category:Mayors of Warren, Michigan[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (and also to Category:Mayors of places in Michigan). Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. Only has 1 entry. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:29, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support merge per nom. Just a clarification as the original creator: Warren is a city of 100K+, so at least in theory its mayors qualify for articles under WP:NPOL — so I created this several years ago, at a time when there was a reasonable expectation that at least some of the others had articles forthcoming. However, that's failed to pan out — I just double checked and Fouts is indeed still the only one who has an article at all. Accordingly, I have no objection to the merge, albeit that we should permit the possibility of recreation in the future if more of the mayors ever actually start showing up. Note, however, that Fouts will also need to be readded to Category:Mayors of places in Michigan as well. Bearcat (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge per Bearcat. Most unlikely to get much population. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge per Bearcat. kennethaw88talk 03:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lime production[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:35, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT
Each of these categories only contain 1 article so they don't aid navigation, and the categories have been around since 2011. The vast majority of similar articles are about citrus production generally or orange production specifically so I don't see much room for growth. But no objection to recreating later if more content appears. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:05, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Notified Dr. Blofeld as the category creator and this discussion has been included in WikiProject Food and drink. – RevelationDirect (talk) 00:05, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment whatever happens "lime production" cannot remain as is. When I first saw that, It thought not of the fruit, but the mineral. lime is not about the fruit -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 04:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Upmerge per nom. It's not obvious that there will be many more articles to fill these categories. (and it's ambiguous, anyway) kennethaw88talk 03:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:American disabled sports organisations & United States disability organizations[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:34, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: To be in line with other country capacities, and "organisations" to "organizations" (American usage). Note that the parent category is Category:Disabled sports organisations. There are categories Category:Disabled sports by country and Category:Disabled sports in the United States (though Japan and the United Kingdom are "disabled sport" not sports). Hugo999 (talk) 08:59, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Support, per WP:C2C, bringing a category into line with established naming conventions for that category tree. RevelationDirect (talk) 12:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.