The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:no consensus. Given that reliable sources and existing article names support the existing category name, this is highly unlikely to receive a consensus to rename at a subsequent relisting. No prejudice against a speedy renomination so long as all editors here are notified, but I don't think this needs relisting. (non-admin closure) ~ RobTalk 18:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The term "NBA championship seasons" is vague since "championship" could refer to division, conference or Finals. The proper name is NBA Finals, and the word "champion" should be used since it refers to the team and not the event. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeNBA championship commonly refers to the league championship, not a lesser conference or division championship. See List of NBA champions, an FL whose name uses the same naming convention when referring to the league champions. If there is any reasonable doubt, the description for Category:NBA championship seasons already clearly states: "This category lists the seasons of basketball teams that won the NBA Finals."—Bagumba (talk) 08:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:moved— Music1201talk 04:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
... as well as the parent category, Category:Academic disciplines. Pruning may be necessary -- with the addition of things like his Military works, it seems to me that Stefanomione was just muddying the waters again -- but this could be a workable category. No objection if someone wants to propose a better solution, including outright deletion. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:07, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support, proposed name is less ambiguous. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:10, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support to remove ambiguity - but note that (1) there are links to the category (e.g. from Category:Works by topic) that should be updated and (2) there are by-discipline subcats that should also be renamed. An alternative I would support is to merge this category (+subcats) into Category:Works by topic (+subcats). DexDor(talk) 21:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Another terminal-stage Stefanomione creation in May that seems to be utterly pointless, useless to anyone other than himself, and an obstacle to easy and intuitive navigation for our readers. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:55, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
In one of Stefanomione's final acts that led to the ANI that saw him banned, here he mixes together seemingly anything and everything as a "discipline"... from forensics to the arts to politics to healthcare, etc., etc.
There's no meaningful delineation here, so let's upmerge to Works by topic. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, by defining 'discipline' as broadly as has been done here, it doesn't really differentiate from 'topic'. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:15, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Sankarist political parties in Burkina Faso[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:no consensus. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I actually created this category. But now I think it was a mistake per WP:OVERCAT. All Sankarist political parties are socialist and the vast majority of them are in Burkina Faso. Charles Essie (talk) 18:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Useful, sufficiently large category. Not prone to attracting numerous WP:NARROWCATs exactly because almost all of these are in Burkina Faso, so will probably never pose a problem for us. --PanchoS (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This a reasonably-sized category of 12 articles, grouped by a shared defining characteristsic. The Burkina Faso subcat serves a useful function in clarifying the parent Category:Sankarist political parties whose lone non-BurkinaF article (Black First Land First) is readily identifiable, but would be lost in amongst the dozen BF parties. --BrownHairedGirl(talk) • (contribs) 14:35, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the reasons added by Fayenatic london. Dimadick (talk) 08:27, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Pan-Africanist political parties in Africa[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: The parent category is small enough for all content in this subcategory to fit in. The vast majority of Pan-Africanist political parties are in Africa anyway Charles Essie (talk) 18:19, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Useful, sufficiently large category. Not prone to attracting numerous WP:NARROWCATs exactly because (almost) all of these are either in Africa or in the Carribean, so will probably never pose a problem for us. --PanchoS (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't it a little pointless though when as result the parent category is almost empty? Why are separate categories needed for Pan-Africanist political parties in Africa or the Caribbean when there is plenty of room for their content in the parent category? (P.S. I decided to add Category:Pan-Africanist political parties in the Caribbean to my proposal.) Charles Essie (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Charles Essie: Personally, I don't think so. Frankly, I'm often in favor of yet another intersection that allows clean parenting to quite specific categories, as long as they don't produce or evoke a heap of WP:NARROWCATs. But let others decide. I'm not married with these ones. --PanchoS (talk) 02:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Upmerge the Caribbean category to all three parents per WP:SMALLCAT and keep the category in Africa since this is a healthy category. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:05, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:administrative close: category was speedily deleted and category creator was blocked. Good Ol’factory(talk) 04:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category created with no apparent understanding of what categories are for, and states an intention to add a wide variety of unrelated topics BilCat (talk) 15:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Absolutely no need for this category. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:26, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
