The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Merge. Timrollpickering (talk) 10:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. This might be a valid category if there were actually an article which adequately explained the distinction between "biopsychology" and "behavioral neuroscience" — but even the main article behavioral neuroscience itself just describes the terms as synonyms. Bearcat (talk) 17:21, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete. I've deleted the book article, so now I'll do the same for this empty category. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:44, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Insignificant category for insignificant author. Isambard Kingdom (talk) 17:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Wait until the article is deleted, then the category will vanish. Oculi (talk) 19:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:Delete. Timrollpickering (talk) 10:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: As far as I can tell, this seems to be a made-up categorization that was then populated with a wide variety of video games (crime, sci-fi, horror, etc.) that matched the creator's arbitrary definition of what is "surrealist." The definition of Surrealism has been an ongoing debate on WP, but the other subcategories of Category:Surrealist works have at least working definitions with origins in the Surrealist movement, and they are all discussed in the main Surrealism article. Video games are not discussed in that article, there is no critical consensus on Surrealist influence on video games, and there is no article on WP which gives this categorization any definition. As such, it is entirely too broad and too subjective to be encyclopedic. I recommend it be deleted. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 16:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While obviously a video game can have some surreal aspects to its visual design, "surrealist" is not a type of video game per se — and thus it's not a defining characteristic of a game the way its genre or its parent studio might be. Bearcat (talk) 17:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support Also, when it's an obvious typo/error, you can move a category to the correct title now. LugnutsDick Laurent is dead 17:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Speedy if possible, as there's no real need for debate about an obvious fix to an obvious error. Bearcat (talk) 00:08, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
