The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete; eponymous category for a company that doesn't have enough spinoff content to need an eponymous category. I suppose one could add Snapchat to this to get it up to two articles instead of one, but a two-article category is still a WP:SMALLCAT, so that wouldn't actually change anything. Bearcat (talk) 16:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was:delete (non-admin closure). For anyone willing to start an article about the Nordic Music Video Awards, these were the articles in this category: I Will Never Be a Star and Ylvis. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: no sign of Nordic Music Video Awards or any other indication that these awards are notable. Would also need a C2A rename to Award winners, but that's by the by. Le Deluge (talk) 15:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not defining. No objection if someone wants to start a sourced article/list later, but I don't think that responsibility is on the editor who closes this nomination RevelationDirect (talk) 16:45, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: To avoid ambiguity and to be in line with the parent as also with the daughter categories. Beagel (talk) 12:11, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- this looks like one that was missed in the tidy up done on the target. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:27, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
